EA Sports UFC 2 Community Impressions

[JoeMimic]

Quote: Originally Posted by Hayman19

Does anyone else find the CPU too easy? On pro I win probably 90% of my fights and sometimes I have to hold back to make it even somewhat competitive. Seems like the CPU is too predictable sometimes. I try to fight realistic but I am finding it hard to have fights that are close, even when I am the much less talented fighter. I dont even think im that good to be honest, but I cant seem to get matches that are even. Seem awfully one sided in my favour most of the time, was wondering if anyone else has the same issue? I love the game, love the KO's and really like the ground game, but I think the game will get stale quickly if I keep winning all the fights.

What about the next level of difficulty? You could always try career mode on adaptive AI difficulty as well although the mode is pretty bare.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by Hayman19

Does anyone else find the CPU too easy? On pro I win probably 90% of my fights and sometimes I have to hold back to make it even somewhat competitive. Seems like the CPU is too predictable sometimes. I try to fight realistic but I am finding it hard to have fights that are close, even when I am the much less talented fighter. I dont even think im that good to be honest, but I cant seem to get matches that are even. Seem awfully one sided in my favour most of the time, was wondering if anyone else has the same issue? I love the game, love the KO's and really like the ground game, but I think the game will get stale quickly if I keep winning all the fights.

Two things: There is a patch coming soon that will help fix some of those issues. Try Hard difficulty. Its backwards but for some people, they are finding Hard to be more difficult than Pro.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by JoeMimic

What about the next level of difficulty? You could always try career mode on adaptive AI difficulty as well although the mode is pretty bare.

Pro is the top level.

[JoeMimic]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

Pro is the top level.

I think my mind was on other sports games when I answered that question haha.

[Pappy Knuckles]

Quote: Originally Posted by Phobia

Clinch denials are easily the hardest for me. Almost all the ground positions I'm pretty good with now, but the clinch is a mystery to me lol. It seems I cant block a single clinch transition, I must rely on them to strike, then block the strike to gain GA, THEN transition to a position which has a take down. Obi-wan your my only hope!

I'm in the exact same boat. I never deny any clinch transitions. My game would be a lot stronger if I can figure it out.

Can't wait for this patch. Hopefully we see some drastic stamina repercussions for the spinners online.

Sent from my SCH-S960L using Tapatalk

[JoeMimic]

^ I'm in the same boat. My guy in UT is getting up there as far as stand-up ratings so I try and keep it on the feet and separated as much possible. I rely on the block a strike method as well.

[HartmanTeets6]

Quote: Originally Posted by Pappy Knuckles

Yep. And please start posting videos of these "poor decisions" guys. I really want to see what you guys are talking about. Like we keep saying, it's more than a numbers game.

No, I completely understand different values on different aspects of the fight. Here's how the fight played out, literally, for 5 rounds:

I'd hit him a handful of times on the feet, he'd take me down. I'd reverse his transition to mount and end up on top. I'd ground and pound him while denying his transitions. Mostly not postured up, but I'd get 2-3 shots postured. He'd attempt 4-5 submissions in a row, NOT ONE getting past the first stage. I'd then hit him a handful of times. I rocked him 6 times in the fight (no knockdowns) You should not be awarded for attempting 5 submissions in a row and never even sniffing the "2nd stage". I also took him down 1 less time than he did me (so the takedowns weren't the difference) Each round went this way, it wasn't like I landed all my shots in 1 round. In fact, the one judge scored it 50-45 me, and the other two went 48-47 him. I have been on both sides of controversial decisions. This one was just plan ridiculous. He literally had 0 offense the entire time, except 2 second armbar attempts from the bottom.

[Thetruth9012]

Quote: Originally Posted by HartmanTeets6

No, I completely understand different values on different aspects of the fight. Here's how the fight played out, literally, for 5 rounds: I'd hit him a handful of times on the feet, he'd take me down. I'd reverse his transition to mount and end up on top. I'd ground and pound him while denying his transitions. Mostly not postured up, but I'd get 2-3 shots postured. He'd attempt 4-5 submissions in a row, NOT ONE getting past the first stage. I'd then hit him a handful of times. I rocked him 6 times in the fight (no knockdowns) You should not be awarded for attempting 5 submissions in a row and never even sniffing the "2nd stage". I also took him down 1 less time than he did me (so the takedowns weren't the difference) Each round went this way, it wasn't like I landed all my shots in 1 round. In fact, the one judge scored it 50-45 me, and the other two went 48-47 him. I have been on both sides of controversial decisions. This one was just plan ridiculous. He literally had 0 offense the entire time, except 2 second armbar attempts from the bottom.

Thats how i feel when i lose by split decision when im sure that i dominate my opponent.

Wysłane z mojego LG-H525n przy użyciu Tapatalka