MLB The Show 16 Twitch Stream - Franchise Mode & Gameplay (Archive Available)

[HustlinOwl]

Quote: Originally Posted by p00p1

There's also this one: http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ying-most.html

and that includes online franchise lmao 62 and 59 dont complete 162 games

[BrianU]

Quote: Originally Posted by BravesBoy

If you think about it, having the attributes hidden and just seeing stats, especially in franchise mode, would add a huge amount of realism imo. Example would be if you were to sign a free agent who had a good stat year but ultimately is a low rated player you may would take the risk because of the stats shown. If you see that same player is rated a 55 then you're in no way going to sign him. You could really add to the risk aspect and flow of signing and managing players. It's a cool idea, I'm not sure how or if it could work. But it definitely makes you speculate

This is what I'm saying. Honestly the way sports games are setup makes franchise modes very easy to play and without a challenge unless you implement house rules for yourself. With this simple change you wouldn't have to go to those extremes to have an even playing field vs the CPU.

When is the last time you built a team up and failed? All of the dynasty threads I read people are always making the playoffs. That is fine I know people like that but I would like to fail occasionally and have things not work out. To me that is just as fun. When is the last time you traded for a player or signed a free agent and they pulled a BJ Upton in The Show? It just doesn't happen because you would never sign a guy with an awful rating who had a big statistics year or multiple ones, then have him return to playing to his ratings. The current way of playing you look at their ratings when making GM decisions and have access to perfect information of what you are getting, where in real life that is not the case and that is one of the elements which makes sports great.

I want to experience the dread and disappointment of signing a BJ Upton to my franchise and destroying the dreams of prosperity for my entire virtual fan base. I had to use that as my example it just fit perfect I hope you forgive me.

[omegon3]

I figure this would be the best stream to ask but does anyone else want 100 players per team roster? 90 just seems...off. I know A games don't register stats (they should, even though we don't have the option to play their games) but it would give roster builders 300 more players. And it would keep all the FAs from retiring from "Poor Free Agent Market".

[BravesBoy]

Quote: Originally Posted by BrianU

I want to experience the dread and disappointment of signing a BJ Upton to my franchise and destroying the dreams of prosperity for my entire virtual fan base. I had to use that as my example it just fit perfect I hope you forgive me.

Agree with you 100%. I would love to hear from Ramone and find out if this could even be a possibility in the future. I know you can't eliminate ratings but if there was a way to hide them, especially for franchise? Could take franchise another step forward for the stat lovers

Someone should run a poll explaining the premise and get a feel from the community.

[Denzel Washington]

Quote: Originally Posted by HustlinOwl

have a look and this a hardcore forum just imagine the casuals http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ball-game.html

Playing every single game in a season and completing a season are two different things

[HustlinOwl]

Quote: Originally Posted by Denzel Washington

Playing every single game in a season and completing a season are two different things

Lmao really keep spinning


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by HustlinOwl

Lmao really keep spinning Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He's not wrong though.

We have a lot of people who go through multiple seasons but don't play every inning of every game of the season.


Can't keep up with the original point of the debate but his post wasn't spinning anything, it was quite frankly the truth.

[HustlinOwl]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

He's not wrong though. We have a lot of people who go through multiple seasons but don't play every inning of every game of the season. Can't keep up with the original point of the debate but his post wasn't spinning anything, it was quite frankly the truth.

Wtf look at poll his post has nothing to do with completing a 162 game season??? Where was it ever implied playing all 162? You have a franchise mode that 500k play and yet majority do not complete


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk