An In-Depth Look at the Changes to the NBA 2K16 Ratings System

[richard2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

Cavs w/ LeBron: 53 wins Rockets w/ Harden: 54 wins Warriors w/ Curry: 67 wins LOL if you really think the Warriors would be doing this without Curry then you haven't been paying attention The fact that you even drag LeBron's name out means you haven't done your research on the topic and frankly shouldn't be commenting (and again, shows your bias). He missed 13 games last year which is way too many for legitimate consideration.

You're acting like Curry's supporting cast, team chemistry and system aren't twice as good as the others.

Sent from my SM-G386W using Tapatalk

[Real2KInsider]

Quote: Originally Posted by richard2001

Are you telling me that Steph is a better scorer and MJ

Stephen Curry is a much better 3-point shooter off the dribble, off a screen, off a pick, and/or with a hand in his face. He does this even though teams gameplan around it and throw the kitchen sink at it. This tangibly makes him a more efficient scorer than Michael Jordan who likewise took his share of contested shots, except they were all worth one point less.

Quote:

and that today's league isn't guard oriented?

I highly doubt you know what this term means and how it applies to the modern league relative to any player from 20-30 years ago, much less Michael Jordan.

[Real2KInsider]

Quote: Originally Posted by richard2001

You're acting like Curry's supporting cast, team chemistry and system aren't twice as good as the others.

Whereas you're acting like the others were actually better enough than Curry for it to matter.

[richard2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

Stephen Curry is a much better 3-point shooter off the dribble, off a screen, off a pick, and/or with a hand in his face. He does this even though teams gameplan around it and throw the kitchen sink at it. This tangibly makes him a more efficient scorer than Michael Jordan who likewise took his share of contested shots, except they were all worth one point less. I highly doubt you know what this term means and how it applies to the modern league relative to any player from 20-30 years ago, much less Michael Jordan.

The league was more physical in the 90s, plus no 3 in the key made it much more difficult to finish. And I never said Steph wasn't way better as a 3 point shooter. I said he isn't as good of a pure scorer as MJ.

Sent from my SM-G386W using Tapatalk

[Speedy]

People.

Go to the NBA forum if you want to discuss whether Curry is the best shooter, has the best team/teammates, etc.

Keep this thread about 2K and in specific: ratings.

[richard2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

Whereas you're acting like the others were actually better enough than Curry for it to matter.

Oh so having 2 all stars and a crazy deep bench doesn't matter? Having an amazing system that gets him tons of open looks doesn't matter? Don't even bring up Love and Kyrie for LeBron. They might be all-star backups, but the cavs bench isn't as good as the warriors.

Sent from my SM-G386W using Tapatalk

[Sundown]

(Removed post as continued discussion belongs in NBA forum)