Home

MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

This is a discussion on MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game within the MLB The Show forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show
Why Player Ratings Change When Starting Dynasty Mode in College Football 25
What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?
The House Rules Hub for Recruiting in College Football 25 Dynasty Mode
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2016, 03:23 PM   #9
MVP
 
jkra0512's Arena
 
OVR: 31
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,261
Blog Entries: 28
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by dran1984
As has been stated before, the commentary/lines themselves aren't the issue. The issue is the programming and logic of the lines, that is what leads to them becoming stale and repetitive. In a stream last year they discussed that they wanted to improve in that area. I'm looking forward to see what they have done with it. The main thing here is, they can do other things to improve the commentary aspect without starting from scratch and bringing in a new broadcast team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbojugend
Totally agreed. Anyone who wants a new team in the commentary booth would probably end up disappointed with the results, at least initially. They've spent years building up an asset library, to scrap everything and rebuild from the ground up would be a massive undertaking and we wouldn't see the benefits for years to come.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree here. While I think a move to a more conversational commentary would be great and most feasible, I'd like to hear new voices in the game with a fresh perspective.
jkra0512 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 03:28 PM   #10
MVP
 
dran1984's Arena
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Mar 2011
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkra0512
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree here. While I think a move to a more conversational commentary would be great and most feasible, I'd like to hear new voices in the game with a fresh perspective.
So you would be fine taking multiple steps back in that area just to hear new voices broadcast the game?
dran1984 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 04:08 PM   #11
MVP
 
jkra0512's Arena
 
OVR: 31
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,261
Blog Entries: 28
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by dran1984
So you would be fine taking multiple steps back in that area just to hear new voices broadcast the game?
If it meant we'd be in a better position in a year or two, yes. Thankfully, this is a part of the game that can be turned off and/or somewhat improved with SOTS. Lucky for you, I'm in the minority, apparently.

Also, what multiple steps are you talking about? I'd rather them focus on gameplay, franchise, and RTTS, but if we're going to go ahead and improve on some things, the commentary is somewhere that could use some TLC.
jkra0512 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 02-15-2016, 04:38 PM   #12
MVP
 
dran1984's Arena
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Mar 2011
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkra0512
If it meant we'd be in a better position in a year or two, yes. Thankfully, this is a part of the game that can be turned off and/or somewhat improved with SOTS. Lucky for you, I'm in the minority, apparently.

Also, what multiple steps are you talking about? I'd rather them focus on gameplay, franchise, and RTTS, but if we're going to go ahead and improve on some things, the commentary is somewhere that could use some TLC.
If they ripped out all existing audio like was mentioned they could not possibly replace it all in one cycle. The lines in the game have been compiled over several years. So you would basically have "bare-bones" commentary. It would also cause more problems with repetitive lines, dead air, and such because there would only be so many lines to chose from. They certainly would not have any kind of stat based commentary and conversational value included. On top of all of that they would have to re-record every name in the data base.

This would be a massive undertaking and would take hours and hours of recording and engineering time. There are many other ways they could enhance what they have now that would require less time and fewer resources. Another possible issue, they could have the current broadcast team under contract, we will never know.

The commentary may not be perfect now, but its a hell of a lot better then it would be if they started from scratch.
dran1984 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 04:52 PM   #13
FA
 
Factzzz's Arena
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,657
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Meh, if we're thinking this way, as in there's so much lines of commentary, that it makes no sense to get rid of them, then we'd literally never get new commentators. Because the lines are just going to continue to pile up over time.

The Show got rid of Rex Hudler in 2011 and added Eric Karros, then they got rid of Dave Campbell in 2013 and added Steve Lyons. So it's not they like they haven't proven capable of adding a new commentator into the game already.

Besides, adding a new commentator, and replacing one would add a whole new feel to the game, because we wouldn't be hearing some of the same lines we've been hearing for so many years. As well as the fact that it'd be a new voice all together.

I'm not saying i want new commentators or anything (although it might be cool), as i don't have any problem with the current commentators. I actually like Matt Vasgersian, in real life he has some really good calls, especially during the playoffs. But i'm just saying i don't like the excuse about there being so much lines of commentary already in the game.

Sometimes you just have to take the plunge for the betterment of the game in future iterations (*cough* player models *cough*).
__________________
NFL : Atlanta Falcons
MLB : Toronto Blue Jays

Factzzz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 05:17 PM   #14
MVP
 
dran1984's Arena
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Mar 2011
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by Factzzz
Meh, if we're thinking this way, as in there's so much lines of commentary, that it makes no sense to get rid of them, then we'd literally never get new commentators. Because the lines are just going to continue to pile up over time.

The Show got rid of Rex Hudler in 2011 and added Eric Karros, then they got rid of Dave Campbell in 2013 and added Steve Lyons. So it's not they like they haven't proven capable of adding a new commentator into the game already.

Besides, adding a new commentator, and replacing one would add a whole new feel to the game, because we wouldn't be hearing some of the same lines we've been hearing for so many years. As well as the fact that it'd be a new voice all together.

I'm not saying i want new commentators or anything (although it might be cool), as i don't have any problem with the current commentators. I actually like Matt Vasgersian, in real life he has some really good calls, especially during the playoffs. But i'm just saying i don't like the excuse about there being so much lines of commentary already in the game.

Sometimes you just have to take the plunge for the betterment of the game in future iterations (*cough* player models *cough*).

Some very valid points.

I am no way saying that the commentary doesn't need improvement. I'm just looking at what it would take to actually implement a new team/announcer. For all we know they could have added someone new this year. I just think there are so many things that could be improved, commentary shouldn't be at the top of the to do list for 16.
dran1984 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 07:51 PM   #15
MVP
 
Jeffrey Smith's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Canada
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Perhaps they have a multi year deal with the commentators and no change will come until the contract expires.

Might be as simple as that.
__________________
MLB: TORONTO BLUE JAYS
NFL: MINNESOTA VIKINGS
NHL: TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS
NBA: TORONTO RAPTORS
Jeffrey Smith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 02-15-2016, 08:05 PM   #16
Moderator
 
kehlis's Arena
 
OVR: 41
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 27,904
Re: MLB The Show 16: The Little Things in This Year's Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by dran1984
Some very valid points.

I am no way saying that the commentary doesn't need improvement. I'm just looking at what it would take to actually implement a new team/announcer. For all we know they could have added someone new this year. I just think there are so many things that could be improved, commentary shouldn't be at the top of the to do list for 16.
Yea, sadly it's not as simple as we all would like.

I think most agree that while Matty V is good in person he can come off a bit bland in the game.

In a perfect world they could spend three years recording new lines behind the scenes with a new crew and then implement it fully in the future but that's just not the reality of the video game world we live in.
kehlis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.
Top -