NBA 2K16 Roster Update Available Now, Details Included (1-8-16)

[Real2KInsider]

Quote: Originally Posted by TalenT

LOL @ this guy. Here you go....Hold this for me....."L" I just figured it out. He just flat out doesn't like the guy. The only explanation I can think of for how you can justify decreasing a player playing better. LOL By this logic Rivers should be decreased too.

Except the whole logical part where Rose's season stats flat out suck, which has been addressed ad nausea.

Rivers likewise has been awful this year. The last 10 games don't take away from the fact that he is a borderline NBA player on the vast majority of nights.

The difference between Rivers/Rose is one of these players actually had semi-accurate (read: LOW) ratings entering the year.

2K was very reluctant to reduce Rose even dating back to last season, which is why his rating can drop even in the midst of a "hot streak". Complaining about a rating change being unjustified ONLY makes sense if the previous ratings were justified to begin with.

[sabastiane]

I haven't played this game since this update. Did they add the all-star jerseys?

[QNo]

Quote: Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds

Man I'm getting a headache about this now lol Everyone agrees Rose has sucked but the last two weeks he's been playing well and the stats posted showed that . People are just befuddled to why he was decreasing last week despite playing well . That is all , his rating wasn't even an 80 before the recent decrease it was like a 79 . If a player is playing horrible then don't be scared to drop him a lot . Tbh Rose should have been this rating a month ago

http://2kmtcentral.com/16/players/8630/derrick-rose

Rose had previously not been updated since December 12th, the Dec 25 update was a league-wide 3-pointer only update. So some of his terrible play from before hadn't been factored in yet.

[coolcras7]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

Really? So when you load up an 82 game season the players should produce like that one good month they had out of six? Sounds like you would have really accurate team W/L records and player production...

Since I don't play season mode maybe you can educate me, how are rating adjusted during season mode ? If you are playing with a specific team is a player with bad rating forever stuck with that particular rating ?

[TalenT]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

Except the whole logical part where Rose's season stats flat out suck, which has been addressed ad nausea. Rivers likewise has been awful this year. The last 10 games don't take away from the fact that he is a borderline NBA player on the vast majority of nights. The difference between Rivers/Rose is one of these players actually had semi-accurate (read: LOW) ratings entering the year. 2K was very reluctant to reduce Rose even dating back to last season, which is why his rating can drop even in the midst of a "hot streak". Complaining about a rating change being unjustified ONLY makes sense if the previous ratings were justified to begin with.

SMH...

That is SO NOT how it works. You take a player's CURRENT rating (meaning the rating starting from the previous update) and the games played between that previous update and the new one you increase or decrease based off those ratings in the areas he improved or took a step back. They don't make his overall up based on those games played LOL!!!! Lol And 2K didn't drop Rose's ratings because they felt he was rated too high dating back to last year LOLLL! You sir....are confused.

[TalenT]

How Rashidi thinks we think it works. "Austin Rivers has been playing like an 85 overall lately...lets make it so w/ his ratings!" SMH

[Real2KInsider]

Quote: Originally Posted by TalenT

How Rashidi thinks we think it works. "Austin Rivers has been playing like an 85 overall lately...lets make it so w/ his ratings!" SMH

That is literally what you are arguing if you think Rose deserves a higher OVR than what he currently has.

[TalenT]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rashidi

That is literally what you are arguing if you think Rose deserves a higher OVR than what he currently has.

***Face palm***

No sir, never said Rose deserves a higher rating. I'm starting to believe you haven't READ a thing we've typed. Makes sense though. We are specifically talking about how he should not be LOWERED! Do you understand my argument now? LOWERED for playing his best ball of the season. No complaints if he stays the same rating even. Can you at least agree that if you play well you shouldn't go down??????????????????????