NBA 2K16 Roster Update Available Now, Details Included (1-8-16)

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Quote: Originally Posted by hear me now

You're saying he should be rated based on his hot streak while everyone else is rated based on their whole season.

No that's not what he's saying , he's saying Rose shouldn't have been decreased for the positive play he has had . He should be a 78 or 79 right now not a 77 where he was dropped to recently .

Use of daily updates or weekly updates is pretty useless of players ratings don't change to reflect current play . Just go back to the every other 4 weeks updates of the past .

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Man I'm getting a headache about this now lol

Everyone agrees Rose has sucked but the last two weeks he's been playing well and the stats posted showed that .

People are just befuddled to why he was decreasing last week despite playing well . That is all , his rating wasn't even an 80 before the recent decrease it was like a 79 . If a player is playing horrible then don't be scared to drop him a lot . Tbh Rose should have been this rating a month ago

[coolcras7]

Quote: Originally Posted by hear me now

You're saying he should be rated based on his hot streak while everyone else is rated based on their whole season.

You do realize that players are updated after the game is released, and several times after, the whole update roster is just not for accessories, if a player is playing better it should be represented in the game. I think the issue is that Rose was overrated when the season start and is now being downgraded to some extent realistically in other not so much.

[hear me now]

Quote: Originally Posted by coolcras7

You do realize that players are updated after the game is released, and several times after, the whole update roster is just not for accessories, if a player is playing better it should be represented in the game. I think the issue is that Rose was overrated when the season start and is now being downgraded to some extent realistically in other not so much.

Yes. Who doesn't know that ratings are updated? It's based on season stats.

[coolcras7]

Quote: Originally Posted by hear me now

Yes. Who doesn't know that ratings are updated? It's based on season stats.

You can't base it on season stats, whats the point if that. If a player plays horrible months ago, and in the last month goes on a hot streak he won't be accurately represent in the game today if you go off season stats.

[hear me now]

Quote: Originally Posted by coolcras7

You can't base it on season stats, whats the point if that. If a player plays horrible months ago, and in the last month goes on a hot streak he won't be accurately represent in the game today if you go off season stats.

The official rosters are based on season stats...not hot streaks, so I don't know what to tell you. If a player can have a significant improvement for a long time, it would have an effect on season stats though.

[Real2KInsider]

Quote: Originally Posted by coolcras7

You can't base it on season stats, whats the point if that. If a player plays horrible months ago, and in the last month goes on a hot streak he won't be accurately represent in the game today if you go off season stats.

Really? So when you load up an 82 game season the players should produce like that one good month they had out of six?

Sounds like you would have really accurate team W/L records and player production...

[Real2KInsider]

Quote: Originally Posted by Hopsin

That's the thing, nobody's asking for Rose to be rated any higher than he was. If anything maybe 1-2 points nothing major. We are asking why is he still dropping overalls etc.

The use of specific attributes throughout this argument has been staggering.

Hell, I even posted them all for you, and nothing.