NBA 2K16 Patch #3 Should be Submitted to Sony & MS This Week, Some Details Revealed

[MadManCometh]

Quote: Originally Posted by 23

They never said that though

But they alluded to that. Many companies do that. Strategic marketing that word something in a manner to have "you" fill in the blanks to make u think something is a certain way.

[23]

Quote: Originally Posted by MadManCometh

But they alluded to that. Many companies do that. Strategic marketing that word something in a manner to have "you" fill in the blanks to make u think something is a certain way.

Im not filling in anything

Thats the short version and nowhere does the blog allude to what you just said. Its ridiculous of you to continue to justify something you just said was inaccurate

[MadManCometh]

Quote: Originally Posted by 23

Im not filling in anything Thats the short version and nowhere does the blog allude to what you just said. Its ridiculous of you to continue to justify something you just said was inaccurate

Continuing to justify ? What I'm I justifying? I was just making an opinion man. Just an observation. Nothing to justify. I agreed with something someone else commented on actually. Just my opinion.

[23]

Quote: Originally Posted by MadManCometh

Continuing to justify ? What I'm I justifying? I was just making an opinion man. Just an observation. Nothing to justify.

It wasn't even an opinion, you just flat out made something up.

I'm all for calling them out if they lied but I'm not sure where you get your "observation" from if they never said that in the blog. They even go into more detail which makes what you said even more false

[Goffs]

Quote: Originally Posted by MadManCometh

Continuing to justify ? What I'm I justifying? I was just making an opinion man. Just an observation. Nothing to justify. I agreed with something someone else commented on actually. Just my opinion.

I'm sorry but how is it an opinion?

[MadManCometh]

Quote: Originally Posted by 23

It wasn't even an opinion, you just flat out made something up. I'm all for calling them out if they lied but I'm not sure where you get your "observation" from if they never said that in the blog. They even go into more detail which makes what you said even more false

They blog said the "adaptive coaching" adapts to what the user is doing correct?

What I'm saying, that is very limited. Because I can adapt to the game and the technology is simply not there to adapt dynamically back and forth with me like a real human coach or user would. It will adapt to some things but on a small scale. There are plays I can do over and kill the CPU consistently. So it's a limited technology. A real advanced system would cost thousands. They used the word "dynamic", which suggests certain things. And the technology that we have on these current systems, it's just not the case

Therefore that's why I said they "allude" in a manner to make someone think it's a certain way when it's really "dynamic" on a much smaller scale., and infact not dynamic at all. A dynamic AI. Is a A.I. that have multiple variations and levels where the A.i. can adjust and do many different things. That's not the case in this $60 game, IMHO.

[BA2929]

Quote: Originally Posted by Impetuous65

I don't think the adaptive coaching engine is working properly if at all.

I have to make defensive and offensive adjustments all the time in my offline games on Superstar or the CPU will wreck me.

So yes, it seems to be working.

Quote: Originally Posted by MadManCometh

TBecause I can adapt to the game and the technology is simply not there to adapt dynamically back and forth with me like a real human coach or user would.

That technology you're referring to doesn't even exist in the world. So unless you have extremely high expectations for a PS4 game, then nobody should have even expected the AI to "adjust like a real human would". What they said doesn't even imply that the AI is going to adapt like a real human. It just says it's going to adjust dynamically to what you do. And it does. Well that is, unless you try and break it which is easy because you're a human and it's a computer with a set limitations of things it can do. AI is 'artificial'. This isn't the movie 'Ex Machina'.

[23]

Quote: Originally Posted by MadManCometh

They blog said the "adaptive coaching" adapts to what the user is doing correct? What I'm saying, that is very limited. Because I can adapt to the game and the technology is simply not there to adapt dynamically back and forth with me like a real human coach or user would. It will adapt to some things but on a small scale. There are plays I can do over and kill the CPU consistently. So it's a limited technology. A real advanced system would cost thousands. They used the word "dynamic", which suggests certain things. And the technology that we have on these current systems, it's just not the case Therefore that's why I said they "allude" in a manner to make someone think it's a certain way when it's really "dynamic" on a much smaller scale., and infact not dynamic at all. A dynamic AI. Is a A.I. that have multiple variations and levels where the A.i. can adjust and do many different things. That's not the case in this $60 game, IMHO.

No you're still making up a bunch of nonsense off of false assumptions and trying to apply said supposition off something 2k never said at all.

They never alluded to anything. The blog gives very clear examples of what the defensive AI does with pictures and player examples yet you want to continue on with your broken narrative of assumption.

You've completely ignored what I posted straight from the blog, nor are you using anything directly quoted from what was posted from the blog.

Its sad how people believe what they want and make up whatever they want on the internet and try to spew that to other people.

You're blatantly caught up in your own misconception in plain sight and still refuse to leave it alone.

Its easy to see talking about technology acting like a human hasn't been achieved in anything at all yet you expect it to be THAT advanced in a video game. Smh