NBA 2K16 Roster Update Available Now, Details Included (11-3-15)

[19LloydBanks82]

Marcus Smart needs an upgrade on defense. Easily one of the best perimeter defenders in the league, he also goes through screens like its nothing, should get the pick dodger badge.

[Xavstuhr]

I am totally ok with Curry not getting boosted but Kobe and Rose falling in their ratings. Curry has an incredible hot streak, but I'm pretty sure he will not keep this up. Kobe's and Rose's decline though seem to be more permanent. Age and injuries are taking their tolls. Ratings should reflect the expected performance of a player.

[Find_the_Door]

So frustrating listening to overall talk... list individual ratings that need changed with basis behind why they need changed - getting sick of hearing about cumulative ratings that have no impact whatsoever.

[MadManCometh]

Quote: Originally Posted by javicd21

That should be the point of "Roster Updates" they should reflect what's going on in the real NBA. If tha means Jeremy Lin being one of the top players for a month or so, so be it. Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk

Exactly. Good point

[MadManCometh]

Quote: Originally Posted by Xavstuhr

I am totally ok with Curry not getting boosted but Kobe and Rose falling in their ratings. Curry has an incredible hot streak, but I'm pretty sure he will not keep this up. Kobe's and Rose's decline though seem to be more permanent. Age and injuries are taking their tolls. Ratings should reflect the expected performance of a player.

It doesn't matter if he keeps it up or not. That's why it's called a "roster update". Meaning if he doesn't keep it up, then it goes back down on the next "roster update". Real simple concept. If u compare his current numbers to anyone in history for a reference, then that's clearly a rating above 93 obviously.

[Xavstuhr]

Quote: Originally Posted by MadManCometh

It doesn't matter if he keeps it up or not. That's why it's called a "roster update". Meaning if he doesn't keep it up, then it goes back down on the next "roster update". Real simple concept. If u compare his current numbers to anyone in history for a reference, then that's clearly a rating above 93 obviously.

Sure you can see it that way. But take for example Lyn's performance with the Knicks. You start your franchise a week into the season and Lyn has the best numbers and best rating overall. Now if reallife Lyn starts declining very quickly and goes back to being mediocre you have your whole franchise experience with a Lyn that is drastically overrated and thus not really realistic.

That's why I prefer the ratings to be more foreseeing than just his impact his last week.

[NFLfan80]

Quick question. I started a franchise with the Warriors with the roster that had bogut out day to day with a concussion. But I turned off injuries which turned off injuries with roster. But now I can't put bogut in the starting line up? I see him on my roster but when I start a game and go to the set up screen he isn't there?

[MadManCometh]

Quote: Originally Posted by Xavstuhr

Sure you can see it that way. But take for example Lyn's performance with the Knicks. You start your franchise a week into the season and Lyn has the best numbers and best rating overall. Now if reallife Lyn starts declining very quickly and goes back to being mediocre you have your whole franchise experience with a Lyn that is drastically overrated and thus not really realistic. That's why I prefer the ratings to be more foreseeing than just his impact his last week.

Ur sort of changing subject's now. But that's cool, I'll roll with it. So, u start ur franchise. So what if Lebron, Melo, Curry, and Harden all go down with season ending injuries IRL. Now ur playing a franchise that doesn't represent the NBA? Therefore, what u do in ur personal franchise Is really irrelevant to what's going on in the real NBA or 2ks official and present day rosters. Once u start ur franchise, it becomes separate and apart.