NBA 2K16 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players

[rudeworld]

Quote: Originally Posted by AnnihilusLivius

Aham...because he is? What makes you think Melo is better than Kawhi? Because he can put 50 in a game and simply let's the other team score 40 on him...? Don't get me wrong, he's a tremendous player on the Offensive side, but on the D, he has the potential and the body for it, but he just doesn't like to work for it. That's what I hate about him and love about Kawhi.

Kawhi is not better then Melo..... trade places... spurs are a 70 win team knicks are in the lottery. Kawhi is a good player but not on Carmelo Anthonys level.

[Futurestyl3]

i think russ and KD should be little higher....

Will probably happen as the season progresses

[DC]

Quote: Originally Posted by Jonjon22

Blake griffin should at least be a 90 overall

I think he should be a 90.5

[jspeed04]

I think Steph is a fantastic ball player. Great shooter, has incredible instinct, and is great passer. But there's no way that he's only a notch under LeBron, let alone *better* than KD.

There are two sides of the ball in basketball. Curry is elite level on one side, and is able to be hidden by his team's all-time great perimeter, and interior defenders on the other side.

LeBron is an elite offensive player, and a better than average defensive player. Is he as good of a shooter as Steph? Absolutely not. But he's one of the games best finishers, best scorers, best passers, playmakers, decision makers and foul drawers. Not to mention that he has clout around the league.

Could it and should it be argued that Steph is a 90? Sure. But historically, LeBron is one of the all time greats. And since the ratings are based off of all time greats(there are only 2 other SF in history as good as LeBron: Pippen, Bird and perhaps one day KD) then LeBron should be higher than, or have a greater gulf between he and other players.

Not a fan of recency bias.

Old curmudgeon out.

[HozAndMoose]

Quote: Originally Posted by rudeworld

Kawhi is not better then Melo..... trade places... spurs are a 70 win team knicks are in the lottery. Kawhi is a good player but not on Carmelo Anthonys level.

Knicks are a lottery team regardless....

[cbpo]

Quote: Originally Posted by rudeworld

Kawhi is not better then Melo..... trade places... spurs are a 70 win team knicks are in the lottery. Kawhi is a good player but not on Carmelo Anthonys level.

Lol while i don't necessarily think kawhi is better than melo, this was a terrible comment. Kawhi is WAY more valuable to the spurs than melo would be. Spurs would be easily getting worse if they exchanged kawhi for melo. Though I also think melo is more valuable to the knicks then kawhi would be.

[wavycrocket]

Top 10 Players how it SHOULD Be in the total vacuum of history and today.

1. LeBron 93
2. KD 91
3. Cp3 90
4. Curry 89
5. AD 88
6. Blake 87
7. Harden 86
8. Westbrook 86
9. Wall 85
10. Melo (Healthy) 85 or Dwight, Gasol at 85.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Equinox831]

Quote: Originally Posted by wavycrocket

Top 10 Players how it SHOULD Be in the total vacuum of history and today. 1. LeBron 93 2. KD 91 3. Cp3 90 4. Curry 89 5. AD 88 6. Blake 87 7. Harden 86 8. Westbrook 86 9. Wall 85 10. Melo (Healthy) 85 or Dwight, Gasol at 85. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd have no problem at all with your top 8, past that things get a little odd, but good list nonetheless.