NBA 2K16 Player Ratings For the Top Players on Each Team

[Kstat]

Quote: Originally Posted by SaruAqua

Again, you're going based off of hypotheticals. I'm going based off of WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED. There's no "if LeBron was on this team". Wade put on one of the best P/O runs ever and LeBron didn't. Simple as that. Wade had a better team but he also faced greater competition. Also, Wade never being the Nba's "best player" is your opinion. It's not a fact. Personally, I have Wade as #1 for '06 and '09 but that's just me. One last question, you previously stated that 93 is a good overall for Wade but he's a tier below Kobe, LeBron, e.t.c. So would you agree '01 Iverson > '06 Wade by that logic?

I think there's a good argument that he's just slightly better, yes. One guy carried his team for an entire season plus playoffs to the point he won MVP and put up multiple 50+ point games in the conference finals and dropped 49 on one of the most dominant teams ever in the finals.

As stated before, Wade being the best non-MVP ever is a really good place for him to be and I could get on board with that. That's where he's at in the game. He's even better than some guys that have won MVPs (like Nash). Iverson in 2001 and LeBron in 2007 were the closest things I've ever seen to one guy taking a team to the finals by himself. Those are really special performances, not just for one game or one series, but for an entire season.

I don't think at any point he was ever more capable or dominant than LeBron or Kobe at their best. There's nothing wrong with that.

[midwestking100]

Quote: Originally Posted by hoi514

finally they put Nick the Quick back in the game! Also Dr J and Kareem is back!

Cant wait to go coast to coast with Nick the Quick!.

[DC]

Quote: Originally Posted by BlazerLaker247

somebody please explain why Rubio has a 82 mid shot nad 73 3pt shot. wha???

Yea I am not sure how Rubio got that 3PT rating when he only made 44 and shot 33%

[midwestking100]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kstat

Well, he was asked to do a lot more from 87-91 and 92-93 the pace of play was still way faster than 96-98. I don't think jordan 1.0 or 2.0 or 3.0 were miles better or worse from each other, but they certainly had very different strengths. I can understand arguments for all three versions, honestly. Really no bad answer.

True. In other words 87-93 Mike= athleticism, 95-98 Mike= intangibles

[BluFu]

Quote: Originally Posted by DC

Yea I am not sure how Rubio got that 3PT rating when he only made 44 and shot 33%

Aldridge got 81 in his 3pt rating.... Hoping some of these ratings are tweaked day 1

[SaruAqua]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kstat

I think there's a good argument that he's just slightly better, yes. One guy carried his team for an entire season plus playoffs to the point he won MVP and put up multiple 50+ point games in the conference finals and dropped 49 on one of the most dominant teams ever in the finals. As stated before, Wade being the best non-MVP ever is a really good place for him to be and I could get on board with that. That's where he's at in the game. He's even better than some guys that have won MVPs (like Nash). Iverson in 2001 and LeBron in 2007 were the closest things I've ever seen to one guy taking a team to the finals by himself. Those are really special performances, not just for one game or one series, but for an entire season. I don't think at any point he was ever more capable or dominant than LeBron or Kobe at their best. There's nothing wrong with that.

We could agree to disagree but I respect your opinion. It's just that Wade fans like myself are so used to him being underrated while Kobe/Bran have been overrated at times. Wade has definitely been robbed of a few defensive team selections by Kobe from '09-'12. That's a fact but all three are still great players. To be honest, I can't complain because Wade is still going to be a beast in the game. '03 Dirk being an 85 is beyond bull****. Dude put up 25/10 on 46%FG/38%3PT/88%FT yet isn't even higher than Nash.


In other words, '15 Gasol > '03 Dirk.

[JBGlass]

Why do they have some at dual position, when they never played at the spot. I understand Duncan, Penny and so on but MJ at SF and most C's at PF c'mon


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[phenom2311]

Quote: Originally Posted by SaruAqua

We could agree to disagree but I respect your opinion. It's just that Wade fans like myself are so used to him being underrated while Kobe/Bran have been overrated at times. Wade has definitely been robbed of a few defensive team selections by Kobe from '09-'12. That's a fact but all three are still great players. To be honest, I can't complain because Wade is still going to be a beast in the game. '03 Dirk being an 85 is beyond bull****. Dude put up 25/10 on 46%FG/38%3PT/88%FT yet isn't even higher than Nash. In other words, '15 Gasol > '03 Dirk.

Finally someone points out the crime committed against Dirk!