NBA 2K16 Player Ratings - Top Rated Small Forwards (UPDATED)

[CMH]

Surprised LeBron isn't rated higher if the overall is supposed to be rated against the entire history of the game.

LeBron is probably already Top 5 at his position.

But the fact he's only a 94 makes me even more confident in 2K's ratings. It's also great because it means more delusional posters get to argue over something so insignificant as a player rating. Those are always the best posts.

[fufo]

The Jazz is not a bad team. I think it's time to understand, accept that.
I think small forward ratings are great.
For Parsons vs Hayward comparison, I think last year it became clear that Hayward is a better player and he showed he could handle a much tougher role.
Hayward's a better passer, better ball handler and a better shooter off dribble.
Parsons is a slightly better defender and a better spot up shooter as well as being a better rebounder.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JerzeyReign]

Quote: Originally Posted by JazzMan

He averaged almost 20 points last season while shooting 45% and 35% from 3. He's one of the most well-rounded players in the league and does everything really pretty well. He also had a PER of 20.2. Just curious, where would you put Rudy Gay, Andrew Wiggins, Giannis Antetokounmpo, or DeMarre Carroll if you're going to drop him?

Don't put your cape on for him as he's gonna show the league himself.

Spoiler

[shockwave8428]

Quote: Originally Posted by JazzMan

Then should Cousins be a 85 because he's not on a playoff team? Just because he put up numbers (efficient ones, at that) on a non-playoff team doesn't mean that he's below a tier as Rudy Gay, who did the exact same thing except with a worse squad.

You have a great point. I guess I'm just a little bit biased, as Parsons is one of my fave players, and even as a Utah resident I'm not a huge Jazz fan. Maybe he is better than Parsons, but I feel as if he is still slightly over-rated. IMO, Giannis and Gay are better than him. But again, it's a very close toss-up with all of those. I feel like there are the incredibly talented SFs (LBJ, KD, Melo), and then the great ones are all in the same league as each other. I guess we can't blame 2k for having their opinions about which players are better.

[Bexthelegend]

Quote: Originally Posted by CMH

Surprised LeBron isn't rated higher if the overall is supposed to be rated against the entire history of the game. LeBron is probably already Top 5 at his position. But the fact he's only a 94 makes me even more confident in 2K's ratings. It's also great because it means more delusional posters get to argue over something so insignificant as a player rating. Those are always the best posts.

Current Lebron isn't as good as he was in 09' 10' 12' or 13'. He lacks the same athleticism as his earlier years, but wasn't nearly as effienct or as good a defensive amplayer as he was in his two championships years. So I think a 94 is good for him. I think 96 would be a good rating for 13 Lebron

[eko718]

Quote: Originally Posted by suh90beast

Wheres Stanley Johnson Sent from a stoner in New Orleans

73 rating.

[Halloween]

Either Durant must rise or Harden must fall.
Doesn't sound right saying Harden is better than Durant. Neither is Curry. Only player better than KD is LeBron imo.

[yellow86]

Ariza lower than Giannis, Demarre Carroll, Wiggins and Gay? Come on now, the guy has great defensive skills, dead eye 3pt shooter, solid slasher and finisher and just solid all around.