Madden NFL 16 Roster Update For Week 2 Available Now

[James0]

Orrr EA could do weekly updates for roster moves and update some generic faces, equipment and face scans and do the ratings over a period of say 4 weeks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by K_GUN

No way Winston should be that high...rooks get rated way too high in this game...thankfully, editing makes it a moot point Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The problem is that we can't edit fully for the things that matter the most. Sure, we can drop the rookies prior to the start of the first season of a CFM, but after that, we can't edit the draft classes, so we are stuck with over-inflated rookies again.

We need to be able to edit more in CFM.

[dat boi Q]

Quote: Originally Posted by charter04

Thanks for the off topic personal attack on a public message board. Isn't this kind of thing against the rules around here? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's ok as long as you are defending EA.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by Flazko

Romo should be higher than Roethlisberger. Romo already has better stats and plus last year Romo was cheated. Romo was number one in every category. Cowboy haters. And I don't understand why if they take the time to do each player's rating they can't do the player's equipment realistically

This is what these threads breakdown in to every week. Player X on my favorite team should be rated higher.

[TexasRyan]

I'm one of the biggest Romo fans out there, but gah can't we just be happy with a 94 and clutch rating? Roethlisberger is a completely different type of QB but he's been great in his own right.

[azdawgpound]

I agree with alot of posters I think the updates should be monthly.... And also with the players on IR...... If they injuried u shouldn't be able to play with them in games.

U don't see real NFL players injuried saying hey coach put me in I got a broken arm leg etc but I can still play.

Again this leads to the injury logo next to names yea I get it suppose to rep a player being injuried but yet again u can insert them in the line up and there's no problem. This again leads to a problem.

Because I know there's a bunch of roster ppl who like having updated rosters etc...but with that lil logo next to there name u can't release them trade them...so u have to wait a week for EA's update.

So again if u can insert the injuried player into starting lineup might well not have that logo to there name... If not then atleast make the player useless like where they can't runor something.

[brgisme]

Quote: Originally Posted by Flazko

Romo should be higher than Roethlisberger. Romo already has better stats and plus last year Romo was cheated. Romo was number one in every category. Cowboy haters. And I don't understand why if they take the time to do each player's rating they can't do the player's equipment realistically

So Romo was robbed last year? Then you say his stats this year are better then Bens? If your going to talk what should of been (i.e. He was robbed last year) don't you have to take his last TD away in week one this year because the Giants gave that to him with the worse clock management ever. I mean if we are counting what if's we have to look at it all. Be happy he got the "clutch" trait given most consider "clutch" to be big games and I'm not sure Romo has a lot of "clutch" wins in big games? When is his "clutch" moments in the playoffs?

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

This is what these threads breakdown in to every week. Player X on my favorite team should be rated higher.

Which is exactly why the fact that EA is considering "crowd sourcing" their ratings process is scary.

May as well make everyone a 99 at everything and call it good if they go that route. All it will be is a race to 99, as if it isn't already.