I get that, but you mentioned his number of dunks without the crucial variable that is his minutes. I personally dont care what a player can do in practice or in a dunk contest if they cant do it in a game. If you rarely dunk in a game your rating should suggest that.
I never said that a game has ever used dunks per game buddy. What i was referencing as unique is that supposedly for the first time ever in a basketball game (according to WTF) the dunk rating will have no bearing on frequency, but instead solely the dunk package the player has access to.
NBA 2K, NBA Live, NBA Shoot out, Kobe Bryant's Courtside etc have all tied the rating to frequency. So a change in that pattern would indeed be unique
James White in his athletic prime could go between the legs from the freethrow line. It all means nothing if you cant do it in a game, so id be all in favor of him having a low dunk rating as well. The ratings are supposed to be representative of what you do on the court, not what we know you can do if given the chance with no one around.
Westbrook on the other hand has proven that he can dunk in-game and do so with some flash, just not with great frequency in general (for a pg sure).
So in the traditional basketball game sense where the higher the rating is, the higher the frequency of dunks, id like to see him with a high rating for a PG, but low in the grand scheme of players. However, if in this NBA Live 16 system a high rating means a 'westbrook' like package with out the high frequency, im all for it. I'd have to see how it plays out though.