Madden NFL 16 Title Update #1 Available Now, Roster Update Scheduled For Friday

[roolz]

Still a few fixes away from having a solid CFM mode then?

I mean yes its playable etc, but there still needs to be a couple of tweaks?

Its the only mode I touch, so if there are glaring problems that will ruin it and the immersion, then I will hold off for now.

Im desperate to get it though, been hovering over the purchase button all day

[extremeskins04]

So I haven't bought the game yet, but I may still wait until these rosters come Friday. If that doesn't fix the issue, i'll wait for 2nd patch I guess.

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by The JareBear

Are the incoming CBs comparable at least?

It would help if they allowed a All players by position sort like you could do in NCAA. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Brightline]

Lets be honest. Ea gets partial credit. They shipped a game with what really were inexcusable bugs. But they did respond quickly and fix some of it.

[althor]

Quote: Originally Posted by Brightline

Lets be honest. Ea gets partial credit. They shipped a game with what really were inexcusable bugs. But they did respond quickly and fix some of it.

Yes it was fast, almost like they knew there were issues during testing but had to beat the deadline so were already working on the patch when the game hit the shelves? Partial credit.

[lopey986]

Quote: Originally Posted by Brightline

Lets be honest. Ea gets partial credit. They shipped a game with what really were inexcusable bugs. But they did respond quickly and fix some of it.

That is pretty much the norm these days, not just for EA, but for almost every "yearly" release title like sports games. That is the downside to having a concrete deadline to meet every year so you can release the game in time for the start of the actual sports season.

[nomarhits400]

Quote: Originally Posted by BlackBetty15

I would disagree wholeheartedly with you on your #2 point. While before the veterans combine I would have agreed, watching the veterans combine proved some interesting insight to shelf life of regressing talent in the speed department. IE...Felix jones...ran a 4.3 low 40 in the draft. Ran a 4.7 or something this combine. That's significant in regression. AND...he trained for that event so I would clip another MS off that.

Agreed. He is saying that if Randy Moss came into the league and ran a 4.3 at the age of the 23, that he would still run a 4.35 at 33....and you have the data to back it up? No you don't- and even if you think you did the sample size of 10 year veterans would be too small to be statistically significant in any case.....And if not 40 times- what objective data would you rather they use to normalize speed ratings across the league?

Further- I absolutely believe their is a bias per position- and those bias's should be baked into the regression. Why would I use a regression model that included OL for a wideout or RB? I could care two craps less If Michael Oher's 40 time has only dropped from 5.1 to 5.15 in ten years. What's that got to do with a wideout running 500 pass patterns a year, cutting 1500 times and being hit another 250 in the process? Not to mention the pounding a RB takes. Show me objective 40 time regression data over ten years for RB's and WR's and I can guarantee you their 40 times drop way more than 0.05 seconds. It's preposterous to insinuate otherwise.

[jeremym480]

Quote: Originally Posted by tef

I didnt change any schemes so everything is default. I just ran the test again but change both to Clutch with High Motors. Robinson 16 games 26 sacks. Matthews 16 games 15 sacks Ratings after 1 season Robinson - 86 PBK 96 AWR Matthews - 87 PBK 92 AWR I'll have to do more tests tonight.

Are only LT's regressing? If that's the case I wonder if simply changing them to RT (even if they're playing LT) would make a difference?