NBA Live 16 Player Ratings - Top 6 Point Guards

[nick_sr]

Quote: Originally Posted by mrprice33

Per ESPN, among pgs with at least 200 attempts, Paul had the 3rd-highest % at 39.7. And, per BBall-Reference he had a lower % of those assisted (meaning off the dribble 3s) than Curry. I'd say he's a great shooter.

Don't watch ad much ball as I did but I don't remember him being good at 3's. Mid range is a different story tho.

[Vic Viper]

I don't mind the rankings....The only 2 players who should not have a 90 overall is John Wall and Damian Lillard. You might have to add Kyrie to the list because he is injury prone and that boy's defense is horrid. He ranks at the 6 spot if we were ranking defense. lol

[mt8732]

I have no issue with cp3 3 point shot rating as long as it is updated throughout thebseason. It's based on actual stats and not just reputation. Now if he starts brick in from 3 this year I need to see that change. Sometimes guys just have good shooting years and sometimes they're bad. Kevin love shot like 30% a few years ago in Minnesota and he's a former 3 point champion

[mt8732]

And for wall I'm interested to see his actual shot range ratings. His off the dribble shot may be good but if his mid to long range isn't high that just means he's more likely to make a shot off the dribble from that range than a standing one but still might not go in because it's not rated as high. Like if he was 93 off dribble but like 79 mid range?

[ThaLiveKing]

Quote: Originally Posted by Halloween

Some of these cats shoot 3's in the mid 30's and are 90+ at shooting. What's Korver gonna have...145? Players have no disparity in their skills. And right off the bat Wall a 93 in shot off the dribble? He's an improving shooter but shouldn't be higher than 80.

John Wall's jumper is laughable. Without Beal, their back court is as good as Kemba and Stephenson

[mrprice33]

With the way the shooting and synergy work together this year, I don't think actual shooting ratings matter all that much. More on this eventually.

[Alfro0925]

Wasn't Erica saying the overalls wouldn't play as big a role as the individual ratings would during the live stream

[The 24th Letter]

Wasn't the goal of Synergy to "remove subjectivity from player ratings"? I'm a bit confused if we're supposed to disregard it...

I'm all for letting the way they play on the court speak for itself (even though the track record in that area isn't glowing for this series.) but no I'm not sure I understand what Synergy is actually doing at this point...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk