NBA 2K16 Player Ratings & Screenshots - Day Four: Kobe, Wall, Ross & More

[redsox4evur]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daddy123

I would have gave him 83-85 range, his fg% was terrible but he still had 22, 5 and 5. + it's hard to lower his rating with the skills he has.

Then let's put every top player on a bad team as a guy in the same range. Like said someone had to score for the Lakers last year...

[Shakedowncapo]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daddy123

I would have gave him 83-85 range, his fg% was terrible but he still had 22, 5 and 5. + it's hard to lower his rating with the skills he has.

Had...Skills he HAD.

[23]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daddy123

I would have gave him 83-85 range, his fg% was terrible but he still had 22, 5 and 5. + it's hard to lower his rating with the skills he has.

He was chucking and inefficient and a sieve on defense

[BluFu]

Hopefully the 00-01 version of him looks good. Hated the fro Kobe in 2K15.

[Jrocc23]

Quote: Originally Posted by thedream2k16

you know it means nothing really lol individual > overall

It's funny the same people that say overall doesn't matter is complaining about Beans overall rating lol. Long as the attributes are on point right?

[jackzagal]

Kobe's rating seems fair IF he's healthy and improves the % and TOs. I thought he would be a 82-83, but 2k decided to be a bit generous there. Hopefully he will justify that rate

[derrtyRedd]

Well kobe's definitely getting rerated by me

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

[redsox4evur]

Quote: Originally Posted by Daddy123

I would have gave him 83-85 range, his fg% was terrible but he still had 22, 5 and 5. + it's hard to lower his rating with the skills he has.

Also let's make a Tony Wroten in a range around 80-82. He had 16.9 PPG, 5.2 APG, and 2.9 RPG all for the 76ers who were around the same team that the Lakers had. He deserves to be in the low 80's right?