Big Changes in Official MLB 15 The Show Roster Update, Designer Explains the Details

[underdog13]

Quote: Originally Posted by evanreyes

Joe Panik and Kolten Wong need, NEED to be higher than 81's. They should both be in the Upper 80's. Same goes for Bogaerts and Crawford. Schwarber needs to go up to at least the high 70's, Tomas should be in the low to mid 80's, Burns should be higher, Boxberger should be higher, Smyly should be higher, and Matt Duffy should be higher. If Carlos Correa is that high, all the other good rookies should be getting buffs too. Goldschmidt, Posey, Greinke and Harper should be 99's, Donaldson should be a little better too.

Lol Kolten Wong higher than 81? What? 81 is generous. Nothing about is stats show that he is deserving of a higher ovr.

And obviously you don't understand how The Show ratings work if you think that 4 more guys should be 99 ovr.

[WaitTilNextYear]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dylonus

I fail to see how McCutchen regressed when his power numbers are on point to match or break his numbers last year. It's still hilarious how Starling Marte isn't 90+ speed. Or how he has only average fielding (that alone is laughable) and ONLY 83 arm strength? Yikes.

Pirates fan?

Quote: Originally Posted by RevisIsland24

Why did Matt Harvey go down? Dumb.

Mets fan?

Quote: Originally Posted by AvengedAgainst

Wow, Cardinals got snubbed. Jaime down after 7 INN, 2 HA, 4 BBI, 5 K, W, QS. Carpenter down after monster two weeks in a row. Grichuk still doesn't exist yet he has better numbers than Kris Bryant

Cardinals fan?

Quote: Originally Posted by Junior_97

Gray git snubbed big time. Two complete games in his last 3 starts. Best ERA in the AL. And he goes down?

A's fan?



This is an easy game....

[RevisIsland24]

Of course I'm a Mets fan. The fact that Harvey's been pitching well lately, and they drop him to a 91, that's a bit ridiculous. Also, deGrom is underrated. He's having a better year than Scherzer, who's a 97, and is still under a 90 overall.

[trankins24]

I love the update, it drastically changes the teams rankings when going into franchise mode.

Also, I'm not sure if someone from Daddy Leagues is on here but I would really appreciate it if they can list player "potential" numbers along with their attributes.

[underdog13]

Quote: Originally Posted by RevisIsland24

Of course I'm a Mets fan. The fact that Harvey's been pitching well lately, and they drop him to a 91, that's a bit ridiculous.

What's more ridiculous is that you didn't read the article. It Clearly says that they used the same formula they would for a out of the box roster. So no they didn't drop him, the algorithm did. He was overrated before (which the weekly updates before were done by manual changes).


Edit: After Looking at all the comments about players going down, how do you guys just skip over the article and not read it?
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

[RevisIsland24]

@underdog13 Who are you, again?

[jb12780]

How is CC still a 79? He shouldn't be higher than 70.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

[jvalverde88]

Quote: Originally Posted by RevisIsland24

Of course I'm a Mets fan. The fact that Harvey's been pitching well lately, and they drop him to a 91, that's a bit ridiculous. Also, deGrom is underrated. He's having a better year than Scherzer, who's a 97, and is still under a 90 overall.

No, no he's not