NBA 2K16 Screenshots - Steph Curry, James Harden & Anthony Davis

[ojandpizza]

Quote: Originally Posted by King_B_Mack

All this graphics talk got me curious so I wanted to do a little comparing. Lot of pics incoming. James Harden Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 NBA 2K16 Steph Curry Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 NBA 2K16 Anthony Davis Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 NBA 2K16 Also decided to do some comparisons between 2K14 and 15 for DeRozan and Lowry along with some courts. DeMar DeRozan Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 Kyle Lowry Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 Warriors' Court Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 Rockets' Court Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 Pelicans' Court Spoiler NBA 2K14 NBA 2K15 Forgive me if I don't take the lighting discussion as seriously as some of you. I do think things have been a bit too dark in arenas with 2K15 and would like to see them brightened up, but I find this current over pounding of the lighting issue and 2K's graphics laughable. Especially since I recall complaints about all the reflections on the court not being realistic and the jokes about all the light bulbs they counted etc. etc. in the 2K14 hype train after the game released. This one certainly got 2K a lot of flack during 2K14's cycle Spoiler Now we're suddenly acting like 2K14 was complete perfection visually? Come on people.

2k14 was definitely... shinier?

2k15 looks lots more realistic, especially the more "true colors" in the jerseys. Perhaps the wood could be lighter on the floors, but I don't really see a major lighting issue or anything I would consider regression.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ojandpizza]

The only thing I dislike is Davis's double chin looking skin.. Too many guys on 2k have it. Every created player does.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[IGhostUlt]

We all thought the visuals were going to improve back in the 2k14 days, but obviously that's not what happened. The graphics somewhat regressed, thats what we are trying to say man.

Whether you like it or not, The shine and reflections made the game look that much better. Without it the game just looks dry and dull.

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Lighting has regressed a little not the CF's and Body types so that's only 1/3 of the " graphics "


Are we really going to compare every 2k16 pic to 2k14 ? Please don't cuz that's going to get uber annoying . Lol

[IGhostUlt]

Quote: Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds

Lighting has regressed a little not the CF's and Body types so that's only 1/3 of the " graphics " Are we really going to compare every 2k16 pic to 2k14 ? Please don't cuz that's going to get uber annoying . Lol

How is that going to get annoying? Why can't we compare?

[ojandpizza]

Quote: Originally Posted by IGhostUlt

We all thought the visuals were going to improve back in the 2k14 days, but obviously that's not what happened. The graphics somewhat regressed, thats what we are trying to say man. Whether you like it or not, The shine and reflections made the game look that much better. Without it the game just looks dry and dull.

Mehh I don't think so. I don't see over exaggerated shiny-ness when I'm sitting in the stands.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Quote: Originally Posted by IGhostUlt

How is that going to get annoying? Why can't we compare?

Because mostly it's just over glorifying of an old game . Nobody wants to look at that every time a 2k16 pic drops , it's like every time Bron does something somebody is like " well MJ did this "

[IGhostUlt]

Quote: Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds

Because mostly it's just over glorifying of an old game . Nobody wants to look at that every time a 2k16 pic drops , it's like every time Bron does something somebody is like " well MJ did this "

But the game only came out 2 years ago and it still does some things very well in the visual department. It's on the same console and everything. We are only holding it to a standard. So i don't see the problem.