NBA 2K16 Screenshots - Steph Curry, James Harden & Anthony Davis

[rejaa17]

Imean I love 2k play the game like everyday..but yea.. their artist sucks.

[rejaa17]

Quote: Originally Posted by rejaa17

Imean I love 2k play the game like everyday..but yea.. their artist sucks.

Wow that came out more negative than I thought... but never the less, just voicing me opinion :/)

[The 24th Letter]

Quote: Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds

For those complaining about Hardens temples ..... He has a wide head Attachment 103759 Attachment 103760 Attachment 103761

Other than the body, Harden looks to have the same head scan from 2k15 no?

Someone should fire up 2k15 and get that same angle....I think you'd see the same head shape...

[MikeGSW]

Quote: Originally Posted by The 24th Letter

Other than the body, Harden looks to have the same head scan from 2k15 no? Someone should fire up 2k15 and get that same angle....I think you'd see the same head shape...

Does your head change shape annually? Mines doesn't. I would fully expect his head to be the same shape.

[cthurt]

The face scans look good, kind of confused why the full body isn't being shown after promoting body scans but my issues are that outside of the things that are scanned like face body and shoes, everything else is a downgrade compared to what 2k did in 2k14, lighting, courts, and jerseys, all downgraded and it's only looking worse with the faces and bodies getting yearly upgrades, I only hope it's not too late to at least touch up on the lighting before release.

[The 24th Letter]

Quote: Originally Posted by MikeGSW

Does your head change shape annually? Mines doesn't. I would fully expect his head to be the same shape.

I hope not.

Lol. that's what I mean though, I just think it's a weird angle....

[blues rocker]

Quote: Originally Posted by McNulty

It needs to be said: the lack of NBA 2k14's superior lighting engine has never been more evident than these screenshots. Scan quality has progressed in two years, sure- but the overall fidelity has taken an step back.

i agree that 2k's lighting is flat, but i'm pretty sure that's because 2k's engine puts a lot more power behind the animations, so there isn't enough space left over for lighting - hence they have to dumb down the lighting effects to make sure the animations have enough resources to work properly...and i'm fine with that - gameplay/movement should always come before pretty lighting.

so i don't think it's that 2k CAN'T do better lighting - it's more a choice on their part to put more power behind the animations, physics, and gameplay-related areas. yes, EA's lighting and skin surface textures are better than 2k's, but EA's game doesn't play as well - i think we can see where EA's priorities are (make it look pretty first, then use the leftover resources for gameplay)...which do you prefer? an amazing-looking game that plays like garbage...or a decent-looking game that plays great? i'll take the latter any day of the week.

[Goffs]

Quote: Originally Posted by cthurt

The face scans look good, kind of confused why the full body isn't being shown after promoting body scans but my issues are that outside of the things that are scanned like face body and shoes, everything else is a downgrade compared to what 2k did in 2k14, lighting, courts, and jerseys, all downgraded and it's only looking worse with the faces and bodies getting yearly upgrades, I only hope it's not too late to at least touch up on the lighting before release.

Agreed! I really wanted a full body shot of AD! I understand why the close ups though.....its geared towards the masses rather than us forum heads....



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk