Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings - Top 6 Quarterbacks

[Allball76]

It sure is nice to see the deep acc lowered ! But dose it matter if the inaccuracy are patch again . I was excited when they announce it but then they patch it ! I man can u really tell the difference in madden in QB passing ?? They need to keep the inaccuracy in there then the elite would feel that way !

[talucchesi]

Quote: Originally Posted by FaceMask

Aaron Rogers is a bad man, we all know that. But Tony Romo was the best QB in pro football last year. He played lights-out championship-level football, and this time a big playoff loss can't be blamed entirely on him. All he did was get it done all season. That was the best quarterbacking I've ever seen a Cowboy QB play.

Now this is going too far haha. I loooove my mans, but he I'd put him behind Rodgers last year, but yea, most definitely top 3.

Quote: Originally Posted by Godgers12

No he wasn't Rodgers was, he played almost half the year on one leg and still dominated.

Romo played with no back last year if we're being 100% fair

[kongemeier]

Hmm, so Aaron Rodgers is the perfect QB. The GOAT! The best there ever will be... Surely he has to when he has the perfect 99 rating?

I REALLY hope EA will take a closer look at these inflated OVR sometime in the near future. Looks like every CFM will have lats of 99 OVR players again this year

[Focus10]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

OVRs are still inflated in my opinion. The lower DAC ratings are good though. I still think the THP ratings are too high compared to the data I have. In fact, the highest THP I have currently is a 93 for Cutler. Newton would be a close 2nd with 92 THP, Stafford and Mallett at 91, and then Rodgers, Kaepernick, Roethlisberger, etc. at 90. Here are my top QBs as of today: Rodgers 94 Luck 86 Brees 81 Flacco 77 Wilson 75 (Yup, no Manning OR Brady in the top 5)

Yikes these ratings are redic low. 4th and 5th best QBs in whole league aren't even rated an 80 lmao. Never happen and it shouldn't because that be awful

[DerkontheOS]

Quote: Originally Posted by Focus10

Yikes these ratings are redic low. 4th and 5th best QBs in whole league aren't even rated an 80 lmao. Never happen and it shouldn't because that be awful

Why's it awful? Cause you're used to Maddens over inflation of ratings? Whats the point of having a 0-100 scale if you only use 80-100?

[sir psycho]

Quote: Originally Posted by DerkontheOS

Why's it awful? Cause you're used to Maddens over inflation of ratings? Whats the point of having a 0-100 scale if you only use 80-100?

Spot on.

I'm worried that EA won't hire Dan because they are scared that the massive amount of close-minded people like this, who are so used to seeing everyone rated in the 80s and 90s, will complain when their favorite players are rated "too low". They don't take the time to actually see how the game plays with these ratings and how much better and more realistic the game becomes. I honestly think that if Dan's system was in place, while it would be met with a lot of criticism from people like this at first, once they actually play the game and get used to it, everyone will be happy. And after a few years of the improved rating system, people will look back and laugh at the "old days" when there were tons of players rated in the 90s.

As you said, what's the point of having a 0-100 scale if you only use 80-100?

Come on, EA...do the right thing!

[Caveman24]

I don't care about OVR just want the ratings properly done.

[Sheba2011]

The mythical legend of Andrew Luck continues. He is not a top 5 QB, he reminds me of Drew Bledsoe with more mobility. Against bad teams he looks like a superstar, against good teams he is exposed. Should have been Phillip Rivers in that spot.