|   | 
|  | Thread Tools | 
|  03-23-2015, 05:25 PM | #81 | 
| *ll St*r | 
                
                Re: For Better or Worse, The Show is in the Details
             
  
    countryboy likes this. 
  
   
                __________________ All gave some. Some gave all. 343 | 
|   | 
| Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|  | 
|  03-23-2015, 05:29 PM | #82 | 
| LADetermined | 
                
                Re: For Better or Worse, The Show is in the Details
             
  
    thaSLAB and countryboy like this. 
  
   | 
|   | 
|  03-23-2015, 07:24 PM | #83 | 
| Rookie | 
                
                Re: For Better or Worse, The Show is in the Details
             | 
|   | 
|  03-24-2015, 12:23 AM | #84 | 
| Rookie | 
                
                Re: For Better or Worse, The Show is in the Details
             
                __________________ David P Thank you SCEA, for adopting my ideas for a Playoff feature and eventually an 'online franchise'. No credit needed to be given... I am just happy you are working towards it... | 
|   | 
|  03-24-2015, 12:34 AM | #85 | 
| *ll St*r | 
                
                Re: For Better or Worse, The Show is in the Details
             
                __________________ All gave some. Some gave all. 343 | 
|   | 
| Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|  | 
|  03-24-2015, 12:42 AM | #86 | 
| Rookie | 
                
                Re: For Better or Worse, The Show is in the Details
             
                __________________ David P Thank you SCEA, for adopting my ideas for a Playoff feature and eventually an 'online franchise'. No credit needed to be given... I am just happy you are working towards it... | 
|   | 
|  | 
| 
 |  | 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.
| 
                
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    Top -
                    
                
             | 

















 If I could see them all at once, I could move guys around a bit if I wanted, although I am not a big proponent of micromanaging many batting order changes, it's more of that ... I am moving this guy down in the order and see how he does down here, or look at this guys OBP, I should consider him at the top of the order... etc... I think it's small stuff really (not the historical stats carryover, though, that is a must).
 If I could see them all at once, I could move guys around a bit if I wanted, although I am not a big proponent of micromanaging many batting order changes, it's more of that ... I am moving this guy down in the order and see how he does down here, or look at this guys OBP, I should consider him at the top of the order... etc... I think it's small stuff really (not the historical stats carryover, though, that is a must).
