FBGRatings Seeks to Recalibrate Madden Ratings, Change Game

[sword1986]

I like these rosters a lot, but they will be meaningless in CFM if we cannot edit the rookies in Madden CFM. As someone pointed out, the generated rookies will go by Donny Moore's scale and be way out of proportion. Ratings have to go with contract size too.

Oh well, it'd be nice to use for the Exhibition player, a shame these rosters can't be used after year 1.

[DCEBB2001]

UPDATE:

All player movement is updated as of this morning's transactions and ratings changes. You will now see players who have improved or regressed based on injuries, performance, and projection. Note that a player who has changed recently will have a + or - designation on each roster list when viewed by OVR ratings.

http://www.fbgratings.com/members/vi...p?team=Packers

[charter04]

I finally finished the second team with the new ratings. I'll broadcast a game soon

[SiNsinNatti]

Yes. Eli 71... Thank you FBG. Lol. On a serious note keep up the good work. It would be dope if the rookies generated were based on in game player ratings so these could work long term in CFM.

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by SiNsinNatti

Yes. Eli 71... Thank you FBG. Lol. On a serious note keep up the good work. It would be dope if the rookies generated were based on in game player ratings so these could work long term in CFM.

Wow. I never actually thought of that but, let's hope that's true. I doubt it but, I can still dream. I do wonder how they are being generated as far as ratings. I really hope it's based on the rosters that are in the CFM your actually in. We can't get that lucky though right? Lol

[WingWest36]

I definitely agree with charter and the rest of you guys when it comes to having the attributes adjusted based on in game player ratings. The rosters prior to the recent overhaul made me optimistic about grabbing a copy of M15. It seems as if it would be unlikely that FBG would go back to the previous rating set (before 7/30), but I still enjoy the current model based off of what I've tested.

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by WingWest36

I definitely agree with charter and the rest of you guys when it comes to having the attributes adjusted based on in game player ratings. The rosters prior to the recent overhaul made me optimistic about grabbing a copy of M15. It seems as if it would be unlikely that FBG would go back to the previous rating set (before 7/30), but I still enjoy the current model based off of what I've tested.

Yeah the last set before this was a trial from March to July. The distribution still had way too many 99s and things like that because Madden requires inflated attributes in order to bump their OVRs. The equal-interval ratings on the site presently are probably what I am going to stick with as it requires less post-source-data alteration.

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by SiNsinNatti

Yes. Eli 71... Thank you FBG. Lol. On a serious note keep up the good work. It would be dope if the rookies generated were based on in game player ratings so these could work long term in CFM.

Don't thank FBG - thank the scouts that bumped his ratings. I don't control what the scouting grades are, I just report the results as Madden ratings.