Sports Daily: Is It Right To Hate On Kentucky Basketball?

[wildcatchild]

Quote: Originally Posted by ehh

While all of your points are valid I think it goes a little deeper than that. Calipari has obviously been a successful college coach so saying "he's won" is a tough point to argue against. Recruiting and motivating are the two most important qualities of a college basketball coach and Calipari has them both in spades which is why he's been successful. Plenty of coaches have won titles without being great in-game coaches. However, the eye test in-game still leaves quite a bit to be desired, anyone that understands the depths of basketball knows that Calipari isn't a great X's and O's coach just like Roy Williams, Rick Barnes, etc. He has a very basic system and does not adjust well (not that this is that much of an aberration in the coaching world). Basic systems tend to struggle against elite defenses. Also, just a personal opinion of mine, but there is absolutely no reason or excuse to use such a simple system. The more movement and more you have going on in your offense the more the defense has to work and the more opportunities there will be for defenses to make a mistake that you can capitalize on. Basically he's going with a simple system because A) he can get away with it in college with supreme freshman talent each year B) it isn't that far from what these poor kids are used to in AAU. Some people think that's genius, I get why he does it but I think it's a foolish move. For anyone who disagrees with me, I completely get the opposite side of the argument (why install a complicated offense for a core of players that'll be on campus for seven months?), just my opinion on the matter. In addition to simplicity, for young college kids, I think he gives them too much freedom. Young players need more guidance and structure. They're still learning the game. Having your "secret tweak" being that you told your starting PG who shoots 36% from the field to shoot less and pass more is not genius, that's common freaking sense. He pretty much threw last year's team under the bus for their underachieving ways (at least he took a brunt of the blame this year). When UK made the boneheaded foul with under a minute left in the title game that ultimately put things on ice for UConn, Calipari's press conference response was to shrug it off to the fact that they're freshman. When asked about Randle struggles? He's a freshman, and he was a little nervous and a little tired. Why in the world you would ever put James Young on Napier to start the title game or switch every ball screen literally had me laughing at my TV. Did Calipari watch a second of the MSU or Florida film? This stuff isn't rocket science. Teams that don't execute well out of timeouts (or coaches that don't have uniquely drawn plays in the huddle) drive me crazy. So basically he's a genius when they win and when he loses it's the player's fault because "they're freshman". Kudos to him for trying to relieve the pressure from his kids but it's complete BS. To say overall that he's a bad coach is obviously foolish, I understand why UK fans get tired of the blanket statement from probably clueless opposing fans that say it only because they hear so many other fans say it. He does two-thirds of the coaching trinity extremely well and that's enough to win a lot of games but he's an average-at-best in-game coach. It is also funny that Calipari is one of the few guys that gets knocked for being out-coached. Ollie out-coached Izzo and Donovan quite a bit and you barely heard a peep from the media about it. He made several mid-game adjustments that pretty much led to UConn winning. Moral of the story... Spoiler Ollie is a ****ing stud.

Post of the Year!

(And yes, Kevin Ollie is a stud)

[ProfessaPackMan]

Quote: Originally Posted by wildcatchild

Imagine if you had to hear some version of the following statement from envious Vikings, Bears and Lions fans 365 days a year: Mike McCarthy is a terrible coach. He has Aaron Rodgers, Clay Matthews, Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, etc. and he's only won a single Super Bowl? Pathetic, all he does is walk up and down the sideline and tell Aaron to sling it downfield every play. I have a hard time believing you would turn the other cheek if this is all you ever heard from your NFC North rivals. But if pointing out stupidity in essay format is sensitive --- as opposed to calling people names and getting banned --- then I guess I'm guilty as charged.

Actually I would because my response to that hypothetical situation would "Yeah but he's still been more successful than all, if not most of you combined" or I could be an ***hole and just say "My team has still has more Super Bowls than all 3 of you combined".

Come on man, you can do better than using the Packers as an example. You'd have a point if I was a Lions/Vikings fan since they've had very little success compared to the Packers.

And who said anything about calling someone names or getting banned? The hell are you talking about? Lol you're proving my point. Like I said, I don't have a problem with y'all fanbase. Could care less about them but since I've been here, everything I said is accurate.

[wildcatchild]

Quote: Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan

Actually I would because my response to that hypothetical situation would "Yeah but he's still been more successful than all, if not most of you combined" or I could be an ***hole and just say "My team has still has more Super Bowls than all 3 of you combined". Come on man, you can do better than using the Packers as an example. You'd have a point if I was a Lions/Vikings fan since they've had very little success compared to the Packers. And who said anything about calling someone names or getting banned? The hell are you talking about? Lol you're proving my point. Like I said, I don't have a problem with y'all fanbase. Could care less about them but since I've been here, everything I said is accurate.

I'm not really disagreeing with you. Yes, UK fans can be sensitive, especially when you have to deal with delusional rival fan bases and the national media (Jeff Goodman, Pat Forde, Doug Gottlieb etc.) who regularly criticize our program. I guess it's the price you pay with an outspoken/successful coach like Cal, although I think it's reached the point of absolute absurdity, hence, this thread.

Actually, I think you could make the argument that the Packers are the UK Basketball of the NFL for three reasons: historical greatness, championships and fan passion.

Anyway, I brought up the part about calling names/getting banned. I personally use this forum to "debate the hate" rather than calling names or, as you suggested, counting championships. That method doesn't always work with some our rivals who aren't good at math and history.

[jake44np]

I am a die hard IU basketball homer.
My dad hated UK and his dad hated UK. With that being said I don't and never had.
Matter of fact I even catch myself rooting for them sometimes. (Please don't tell my relatives!)
For me the it has to do with my love for Notre Dame football I think. I know what ur thinking dude is a IU bball fan and ND football fan. Pick a damn school already.
Well here is how I got to where I am at. I grew up in Bloomington with my dads side of the family and everyone were Bob Knight lovers. I grew up going to 5 or so games a year and have passion for IU bball.
With that being said my grandpa on my moms side graduated from ND and started taking me to ND football games when I was 2. I have been to over 75 ND games and love the place.
Anywho ND football and UK bball have a lot in common. U either love them or hate them, plain and simple. Unless ur me, again I don't love UK but certainly don't hate them.
Like I said I sometimes catch myself rooting for them simply because most people hate them that I know. Just like a ton of people hate ND for no reason. Have I made mt point? I hope so. Lol

[wildcatchild]

Quote: Originally Posted by jake44np

I am a die hard IU basketball homer. My dad hated UK and his dad hated UK. With that being said I don't and never had. Matter of fact I even catch myself rooting for them sometimes. (Please don't tell my relatives!) For me the it has to do with my love for Notre Dame football I think. I know what ur thinking dude is a IU bball fan and ND football fan. Pick a damn school already. Well here is how I got to where I am at. I grew up in Bloomington with my dads side of the family and everyone were Bob Knight lovers. I grew up going to 5 or so games a year and have passion for IU bball. With that being said my grandpa on my moms side graduated from ND and started taking me to ND football games when I was 2. I have been to over 75 ND games and love the place. Anywho ND football and UK bball have a lot in common. U either love them or hate them, plain and simple. Unless ur me, again I don't love UK but certainly don't hate them. Like I said I sometimes catch myself rooting for them simply because most people hate them that I know. Just like a ton of people hate ND for no reason. Have I made mt point? I hope so. Lol

Well said Jake!

Look, I get the reason people don't like and/or pull for UK. It's the same reason I don't cheer for the Yankees, Steelers or St. Louis Cardinals. They win, they win big, and it's usually at my favorite team's expense (Cubs, Bengals, Reds, etc.). However, the level of hate that spews from a few media members is unprecedented and downright disturbing at times. I'm talking about guys like Wilbon, Forde, Goodman, Thamel, etc. These guys are supposed to be professional journalists but they do absolutely nothing to hide their disdain for all things Calipari/UK.

Maybe I don't follow other sports closely enough but I can't think of anything that compares to the hate I'm seeing, at least in terms of sports journalism. It reminds me a lot of political analysts on TV, how their non-preferred party can do nothing right whereas their preferred party can do nothing wrong. Even if a reporter is proven wrong, he or she will never admit it and will stop at nothing to keep spinning facts to support their agenda. We're already seeing some of the media spin after most of UK's players said they were returning. The narrative has suddenly switched from "Calipari is ruining to college basketball with his one-and-done approach" to "Calipari is going to have his hands full managing this front court log jam" and "some of the UK players aren't going to be happy with their playing time."

[jake44np]

There was a lot of hate from a lot of these guys b4 Cal ever came to UK.

[wildcatchild]

Quote: Originally Posted by jake44np

There was a lot of hate from a lot of these guys b4 Cal ever came to UK.

I know, it stems from the days when we were on probation, first during the Rupp era and then the Eddie Sutton fiasco. I knew hiring Calipari would create a powder keg situation, just never imagined how over-the-top it's gotten in recent years.

[jake44np]

Find me someone who hates Northwestern basketball.
Points is no one does because they usually are not very good and they have never made the NCAA tourney. No one hates bad teams.
There is a fine line between hate and jealousy.