We are in 100% agreement on being able to manually make adjustments to stop anything as a coach/player. I never stAted otherwise. I'm simply stating at what point do ratings mAtter, or even individuality of plAyers if ANY WR can beat ANY and every CB unless you make manuAl adjustments? So the offense runs no huddle, hurries to the LOS, you know he's throwing a corner route to the slot WR to the wide side of the field, so you go thru the manual adjustments to contain the corner route, he quick snaps and hits the curl against an "elite" CB 100% of the time.
I'm all about manually making adjustments And plays but the defense is always at a disadvantage as it is. A CB like Sherman and Revis should REACT on a route
Much quicker because of their ratings and the elite players that they Are. What is the point of plAyer rAtings at all? If mediocre CBs can be made to stop the curl, and elite CBs need the same manual adjustments to stop basic routes like a curl, what is the difference in the players?
That's just the CB position. Every QB is deadly accurate, a 3rd string LT blocks as good as a pro bowl tackle, and the list goes on. Again, I'm all for manual adjustments pre play to counter the offense, and clicking on to make plays manually during the play. That's not the point. If realism is to be achieved Sherman should not get beAt 100% of the time simply because he's in base man coverage. If I haver bring up my 4th CB in press coverage, disguise coverage, shade him in or out, yet I HAVE to do those same things with the elite, pro bowl CB, what's the difference in the player? What does the man coverage rating do? The play recognition rating? The awareness rating?