NHL 14 Player Ratings - Top 50 Players (#1-10 Revealed)

[jyoung]

All I have to say is that Fleury's ratings better be brought down finally.

Fleury has consistently been one of the highest rated goalies in EA NHL since he debuted, despite his constant meltdowns and the fact that he couldn't even crack the lineup in the playoffs last year.

[Fiddy]

Quote: Originally Posted by jyoung

All I have to say is that Fleury's ratings better be brought down finally. Fleury has consistently been one of the highest rated goalies in EA NHL since he debuted, despite his constant meltdowns and the fact that he couldn't even crack the lineup in the playoffs last year.

his ratings do deserve a hit.. have needed change for past few years!

but, in 2010, team in front of him melted down vs Habs, 2011, vs Bolts, without 87 and 71, team in front of him blew the 3-1 lead, in 2012 vs Flyers, just watch the videos of the goals the Flyers scored, wide open shots into wide open nets on the PP, 5 on 5, even SH, MAF didnt have a chance. remember games 1 and 2 of that series? Pens should have won both, again, team meltdown in front of him. that series could have went 7, but didnt.

im not saying MAF isnt a head case, he is, but if the team played the way they should have in front of him they win some of those games and series.

[Dolphins88]

They need to do a better job of ratings.. Kane not in top 10 and Crosby first.. Bs...EA wasn't watching the same Stanley cup playoffs I did. Crosby was on his *** most of the Boston series whereas Kane could not be denied. Toews was being physically abused by Boston so it's hard to tell what he would have done had they called penalties and wasn't hurt.
EA needs more categories for ratings.. Slap shot, wrist shot, snap shot, backhand , passing, saucer passes, stick handling ( where Crosby decreases ) , agility, acceleration , lateral skating, backwards skating, speed, hitting power, aggressiveness, fighting, agitator, balance, playmaking, puck control, forecheck , etc and that's for players... Goalies next

[centauris]

Quote: Originally Posted by Fiddy

his ratings do deserve a hit.. have needed change for past few years! but, in 2010, team in front of him melted down vs Habs, 2011, vs Bolts, without 87 and 71, team in front of him blew the 3-1 lead, in 2012 vs Flyers, just watch the videos of the goals the Flyers scored, wide open shots into wide open nets on the PP, 5 on 5, even SH, MAF didnt have a chance. remember games 1 and 2 of that series? Pens should have won both, again, team meltdown in front of him. that series could have went 7, but didnt. im not saying MAF isnt a head case, he is, but if the team played the way they should have in front of him they win some of those games and series.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpdHX8whAU

[bwiggy33]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dolphins88

They need to do a better job of ratings.. Kane not in top 10 and Crosby first.. Bs...EA wasn't watching the same Stanley cup playoffs I did. Crosby was on his *** most of the Boston series whereas Kane could not be denied. Toews was being physically abused by Boston so it's hard to tell what he would have done had they called penalties and wasn't hurt. EA needs more categories for ratings.. Slap shot, wrist shot, snap shot, backhand , passing, saucer passes, stick handling ( where Crosby decreases ) , agility, acceleration , lateral skating, backwards skating, speed, hitting power, aggressiveness, fighting, agitator, balance, playmaking, puck control, forecheck , etc and that's for players... Goalies next

Ratings aren't defined by a Stanley Cup playoff series. They are defined by consistent play throughout a 3 or 4 year stretch. Crosby is an all around better player than Kane by far. You are merely comparing what they do on the offensive end instead of looking how they play all over the ice. If ratings were done after one playoff year then Bickell would be rated better than Towes in NHL 14 and I'm pretty darn sure that should never happen.