Home

SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

This is a discussion on SEC, Pac-12, Big Ten Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-14-2013, 01:08 PM   #65
Pro
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Apr 2009
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by xirdneh132
From a selfish perspective this sucks but from a big picture perspective I'm still on the side of O'Bannon and the others. The NCAA has a long history of taking advantage of the players and for those of you trying to side with the NCAA (mostly because you care about video games) go through the abuses of the NCAA and there is no defending them. The NCAA had this coming, it's their fault not O'Bannon's or any of the players, blaming the players is easy and lazy when the NCAA is really the one at fault. I love this game and don't want to see it go but it's the price we pay for the NCAA's greed and all we can hope for (since the writing seems to be on the wall) is that EA has at least one more game in them and they should man up and make the best possible game they can make, even if it means they release if later than usual. Make a game believing it's your last and go out in a blaze of glory.
Blaming the Players is easy and Lazy?
UCLA provided Ed O'Bannon with a free education, food, and healthcare valued at over $100,000.

ULCA and the NCAA provided a platform for Ed O'Bannon to showcase his talents and provided him with National exposure to build his personal Brand.

In 1995 Ed O'Bannon signed a 3-year $3.9 million dollar contract.

So now it's EA sports fault and the NCAA that Ed O'Bannon squander his riches? And he is trying to get a small piece of something he was already compensated for, but not in the way he wanted it?

it's easy to say pay the players, the NCAA makes money on them. But let me ask you a question. How many ppl on OS could name the top 25 minor league baseball players in this country? Now how man ppl on OS can name the top 25 collegiate football players? The NCAA and it's member university provide these players with unprecedented exposure to build their brands and get a free education. The "student-athlete" has to recognize that opportunity and make the most of it.
dghustla is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 08-14-2013, 01:09 PM   #66
Pro
 
OVR: 8
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by wpgfan
Playing this game on the computer?....eeeeeeeh. However, you are right. You'd have kids going days straight until it was as good or if not better than the actual produced product.
Of course....one of those people.

My computer is hooked up to my 65" 1080p in the living room. I play the majority of my PC games with an Xbox 360 controller.

That's my last post on the topic, I'm not getting into it with people. The game would be better on PC and modders could do whatever they wanted with it. But hey.....enjoy being stuck with whatever they give you on consoles.
mva5580 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 01:11 PM   #67
Rookie
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Jan 2009
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMBrown
the players know what they're signing up for when they sign the commitment.
MrMBrown, no 18 year olds signing a scholarship don't know everything they sign up for. As a finance guy for a credit card processing company most merchants have no idea what they're signing up for and that is with us explaining it to them and a full 3 page contract. NCAA contracts are much longer, more rules, more nuanced terms, and far more legal issues. No 18 year old knows what they are signing up for and neither do most parents, even intelligent ones who read everything. Only lawyers really understand everything that is on there and very few of these families can afford a lawyer to look over everything.
xirdneh132 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 01:12 PM   #68
(aka Alberto)
 
aholbert32's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 33,173
Blog Entries: 8
Re: The SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

Do people really care that much about logos? As long as the teams are in the game with their unis and stadiums, does anyone really care if the SEC is called the "Southern Conference" in the game?
aholbert32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 01:13 PM   #69
Banned
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Jun 2013
Re: The SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by xirdneh132
MrMBrown, no 18 year olds signing a scholarship don't know everything they sign up for. As a finance guy for a credit card processing company most merchants have no idea what they're signing up for and that is with us explaining it to them and a full 3 page contract. NCAA contracts are much longer, more rules, more nuanced terms, and far more legal issues. No 18 year old knows what they are signing up for and neither do most parents, even intelligent ones who read everything. Only lawyers really understand everything that is on there and very few of these families can afford a lawyer to look over everything.
I'm sure that's what it is.
MrMBrown is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 01:16 PM   #70
Pro
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Apr 2009
Re: The SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by aholbert32
Do people really care that much about logos? As long as the teams are in the game with their unis and stadiums, does anyone really care if the SEC is called the "Southern Conference" in the game?
You don't the SEC would sue EA if they tried to replica their conference without it's consent?

EBO is suing because of a generic bald black avatar on UCLA had his number lol.
dghustla is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013, 01:20 PM   #71
Pro
 
laxman490's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Re: The SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

i wonder how the lsu and bama fan in the other thread feel now that their precious SEC isnt going to use their logo.

on a side note, i think people are underestimating what effect this could have. remember when pro evolution soccer had much better gameplay than fifa, but it always under sold fifa because it didnt have authentic teams/leagues...
laxman490 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 08-14-2013, 01:21 PM   #72
(aka Alberto)
 
aholbert32's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 33,173
Blog Entries: 8
Re: The SEC Won't License Trademarks in Future Video Games

Quote:
Originally Posted by dghustla
You don't the SEC would sue EA if they tried to replica their conference without it's consent?

EBO is suing because of a generic bald black avatar on UCLA had his number lol.
They only own the mark. That suit would get tossed at the motion to dismiss stage.

EBO is suing because it had its number, had similar physical characteristics and played on a specific UCLA team
aholbert32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.
Top -