More Links

ndirish6776 · 06-13-2013, 01:12 PM

ND seems pretty accurate all around. Carlisle and Atkinson at RB are both probably a bit high but I don't think any ND fans would be shocked if they both have great years. Would have made them 85-87 as opposed to 89s. Fox at MLB is overrated and too fast while Shembo at OLB is underrated and too slow. Tuitt is underrated as a 91, and Jackson is a bit underrated at CB.

I'm surprised Jones and Russell aren't 88s, but I'm sure ND is going to have a TON of starters in the 84-87 range as these rankings seem low for a team that is a 93 on offense and defense.

But Golson being in the game makes up for anyone else being overrated lol.

Strategizer · 06-13-2013, 01:13 PM

Would like to see Missouri's if someone gets the chance.

DirtyJerz32 · 06-13-2013, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harlemkiid149


	do people actually still run the GTech triple option?(i gave up on NCAA a while ago)

I ran it for 3 year in my OD and had great success. Just switch to the spread the last 2 years because I only have 1 star running back.

BurghFan · 06-13-2013, 01:14 PM

Damn, nobody in the 90's and only 5 guys in the 80's. Gonna be an uphill battle with Pitt. (not that I'm all that surprised)

BleedGreen710 · 06-13-2013, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 32


	Stupid iPhone. Any chance someone could show me PSU?

Rolltide78980 · 06-13-2013, 01:18 PM

Could someone post alabama's? Thx

GruffyMcGuiness · 06-13-2013, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harlemkiid149


	do people actually still run the GTech triple option?(i gave up on NCAA a while ago)

I don't. Blocking is horrendous so I usually just run the Nevada playbook since we run a lot of pistol now.

GruffyMcGuiness · 06-13-2013, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BurghFan


	Damn, nobody in the 90's and only 5 guys in the 80's. Gonna be an uphill battle with Pitt. (not that I'm all that surprised)

Welcome to the ACC! :thumbup:

06-13-2013, 01:12 PM	#17
ndirish6776 Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jul 2011	Re: NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team ND seems pretty accurate all around. Carlisle and Atkinson at RB are both probably a bit high but I don't think any ND fans would be shocked if they both have great years. Would have made them 85-87 as opposed to 89s. Fox at MLB is overrated and too fast while Shembo at OLB is underrated and too slow. Tuitt is underrated as a 91, and Jackson is a bit underrated at CB. I'm surprised Jones and Russell aren't 88s, but I'm sure ND is going to have a TON of starters in the 84-87 range as these rankings seem low for a team that is a 93 on offense and defense. But Golson being in the game makes up for anyone else being overrated lol.

06-13-2013, 01:13 PM	#18
Strategizer Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Jan 2013	Re: NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team Would like to see Missouri's if someone gets the chance.

06-13-2013, 01:14 PM	#20
BurghFan #BurghProud OVR: 34 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 10,113 Blog Entries: 2	Re: NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team Damn, nobody in the 90's and only 5 guys in the 80's. Gonna be an uphill battle with Pitt. (not that I'm all that surprised) LambertandHam likes this. __________________ Moderator Steelers: IX, X, XIII, XIV, XL, XLIII Penguins:1990/91, 1991/92, 2008/09, 20015/16, 2016/17 Pirates:1909, 1925, 1960, 1971, 1979 Panthers (FB): 1915, 1916, 1918, 1929, 1931, 1934, 1936, 1937, 1976 Panthers (MBB): 1927/28, 1929/30

06-13-2013, 01:18 PM	#22
Rolltide78980 Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: May 2013	Re: NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team Could someone post alabama's? Thx

	A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
	NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
	College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own

More Links

NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 10 Players From Each Team