NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 15 Players

[BloodBCrimson]

Quote: Originally Posted by stugotsII

Like it or not Miller is most likely the best player in the Big Ten. Queue the anti B10 jokes now… Miller finished 5th in the Heisman voting as a sophomore learning a totally new offense. Millers ability to throw the ball is a little underrated IMO. But his ratings in this game are fine. The kid has a cannon for an arm…and the accuracy will come. Anyone wondering how Miller will do in his 2nd year under Urban Meyer….take a look at what QB's have done in their 2nd year under UM. Bowling Green it was Josh Harris. Utah it was Alex Smith. Florida it was Tim Tebow. The stats and wins these QB's accounted for in their 2nd year is crazy. And with Miller now having weapons around him…the offense will average over 40 per game easily.

Until the play a real defense in the championship game.

[NowAndLaterCARZ]

everything looks good, but i'd swap bridgewater's 96 with McCarron's 97. teddy bridgewater reminds me of a rg3/russell wilson. and i'd maybe give johnny football a 98 rating, his espn special on the beach with kirk was impressive ha

[niebs79]

AJ MCCaron a 97 OVR??? Not so fast my friend!

[iKnowledge]

AJ McChampion does it again!!!


Roll Tide but he is not a 97...




I guess this is proof EA is really working to differentiate player models as not to be true to life representations? lol

[Swamp Swagger]

Quote: Originally Posted by stugotsII

Like it or not Miller is most likely the best player in the Big Ten. Queue the anti B10 jokes now… Miller finished 5th in the Heisman voting as a sophomore learning a totally new offense. Millers ability to throw the ball is a little underrated IMO. But his ratings in this game are fine. The kid has a cannon for an arm…and the accuracy will come. Anyone wondering how Miller will do in his 2nd year under Urban Meyer….take a look at what QB's have done in their 2nd year under UM. Bowling Green it was Josh Harris. Utah it was Alex Smith. Florida it was Tim Tebow. The stats and wins these QB's accounted for in their 2nd year is crazy. And with Miller now having weapons around him…the offense will average over 40 per game easily.

You all can preach that mumbo jumbo all pre season. I still won't see how a Qb who had below average passing stats and on a offense that was ranked nearly in the 70's overall should get a almost a 99 rating

Until I/we see it against some decent teams I don't buy it. If they anything but undefeated with that schedule it should be a disappointing season in my opinion.

Its this reason alone that we see so many 90+ players, and teams.

[cparrish]

Quote: Originally Posted by Swamp Swagger

Its this reason alone that we see so many 90+ players, and teams.

Actually the reason there are so many 90+ teams has nothing to do with the players ratings as much as it has to do with the way the game calculates a team's rating.

[Swamp Swagger]

Quote: Originally Posted by cparrish

Actually the reason there are so many 90+ teams has nothing to do with the players ratings as much as it has to do with the way the game calculates a team's rating.

Guess so. I don't know I just like a bigger distance between teams like there is in real life....

[ActLikeYouCrow]

Quote: Originally Posted by cparrish

Actually the reason there are so many 90+ teams has nothing to do with the players ratings as much as it has to do with the way the game calculates a team's rating.

yeah i wish they would go to a system that makes some kind of sense rather than having all your starters being an 80 ovr meaning youre a 92 ovr team.