NCAA Football 14 Player Ratings - Top 15 Players

[The_Wise_One]

Not bad. Nice to see only one elite player. Mosley seems a tad too high, maybe a 95 would be better

[boxboy99]

As a Buckeye fan, I say Miller's QBA is too high, but 84 is pretty average on the game. I'm rolling with Clemson in my Online Dynasty, so very exciting to run with Boyd and Watkins.

[GetReal]

How did Braxton Miller even break 90

[Gotmadskillzson]

They all too damn high......But then again they are always too high every year.

[JerseySuave4]

don't know what you guys are talking about, these guys in the game aren't based off of real players.

[TripleCrown9]

Quote: Originally Posted by JerseySuave4

don't know what you guys are talking about, these guys in the game aren't based off of real players.

Well then the guy that wrote the article shouldn't have addressed all 15 players by name lol.

[Gap Integrity]

Quote: Originally Posted by freernnur5

Everything looks good to me except this one point when discussing Braxton Miller: "Miller is a very good passer (91 Throw Power, 84 Throw Accuracy)" He is an excellent runner as a QB, but not that good as a passer. He finished tied for 43rd in the country in passer rating at 140.5 (McCarron was #1 at 175.3). His YPA of 8.0 is tied for 25th with 9 other QBs. His completion percentage of 58.3% was good for 80th in the country. Do those stats really show someone who is a very good passer to you? I know I am a Michigan fan so this may sound like the homer in me talking. He is a very good QB because of his legs and that opens throwing opportunities for him, but to say he is a very good passer is a little laughable. Just compare that year of his to Denard Robinson's from 2011 (2012 he was injured for 5 games and was not a QB so the stats aren't a fair comparison). 2011 - 55.0%, 8.4 YPA, 139.7 passer rating. Keep in mind Denard had 15 ints that year to sink his passer rating as opposed to the 6 Miller had in 2012. Everyone, including myself would admit Denard Robinson is not a very good passer. He was electric because of his legs first and foremost.

I totally agree with you as a Buckeye fan. It looks like EA boosted his Passing attributes tremendously. He is a phenom running and scrambling, but he is certainly not anywhere near an elite passer, which a 96 OVR suggests. I don't care how much time he spent with George Whitfield, until he proves he has improved on the field, I'd say EA overrated him. You can't always look at the OVR rating, but in this case they had to have pumped his arm up to achieve that mark. My only recommendation to people who don't like it is Download the Buffeye roster when we drop it.

[theharbinater]

Quote: Originally Posted by Gotmadskillzson

They all too damn high......But then again they are always too high every year.

agreed. i wish ncaa and madden would be cooperative in their ratings.

a 99 should be best in the world, all-timer type player, and should never happen in college.

i dont think there should be a cap on college players, but very rarely should any of them be in the 90's, and the elite should usually be in the mid-high 80's where most good-not-great pro's are. maybe a handful each year. those that would play and impact from day 1 in nfl, like clowney, julio/aj green a few years back, cam newton, luck/rg3, etc.

most players should be in 60's/70's, with the good in the high 70's/low 80's, and elite in mid/high 80's, with a rare low 90 player like peterson and manning.

as for those ratings, relative to each other, doesn't look bad. clowney is clearly the best player, followed by manziel and a handful of other good qb's and a few tackles.