NCAA Football 14 - A Deeper Look at Power Recruiting

[khaliib]

Quote: Originally Posted by Cowboy008

They said that the recruit is only allowed 5 visits a season has that always been like that?

NCAA rule is 5 paid trips at the school expense over 5 weeks.
You can take as many as you want, just after 5, the sneaky stuff happens.
But what recruit wants to visit a school during the week?
It's about the weekend and all the stuff (parties etc...) that comes with that, which are major selling points to a school.

Basically 5 vacations (if you take all) to be courted and pampered like a star.

[khaliib]

Quote: Originally Posted by Exile04

like other post they give us something good and it gets nit picked. I like it, yes it could be more in-depth tho. The thing is its jsut if you bring them in on the same week tho. i look at what my huskies did last year when they sign 7 on the same day and for the most part it was one player at a position maybe 2 DL. in real life a guy thats a 5 star wouldnt be worried about visiting with a 2-3 star at the same position, but if 2 5star RB's came i could see the problem.

not true at all.
Most coach's don't play guys based off of their star rating (that's for media and fans, ie marketing)

When Spring Ball comes around, these guys are hit with a dose of reality.
The 1st thing being that your highschool hype don't mean squat.
(1st taste of live college contact always brings things into perspective, love, love, love the Oklahoma Drill!!!)

He's thinking about it, best believe that.

[Exile04]

Quote: Originally Posted by khaliib

not true at all. Most coach's don't play guys based off of their star rating (that's for media and fans, ie marketing) When Spring Ball comes around, these guys are hit with a dose of reality. The 1st thing being that your highschool hype don't mean squat. (1st taste of live college contact always brings things into perspective, love, love, love the Oklahoma Drill!!!) He's thinking about it, best believe that.

i understand the coaches dont look at that but the kid can. they see a guy that they are competing with, the coach puts the other with a senior that he wanted to hangout with thats bad. Or thinks hes getting treated different.

[Strategizer]

Quote: Originally Posted by JerseySuave4

He did go on other visits after Auburn it's just that Auburn is where he felt comfortable because of the coaches there. Irony here is after he chose to de-commit he visited FSU first, then Florida and finally LSU. He wanted to commit to Florida. The night before National Signing day he was in my office at work, my boss (who also coached with me) helped him with tuition in high school and has been helping his family so he's like a father figure and the 3 of us along with his father & grandfather sat in our conference room on a conference call with Les Miles. We all were trying to convince him to go to LSU while the kid (i'll leave his name out of it) was dead set on Florida. It was pretty cool to hear Les make his final pitch the night before signing day. But 5 mins before he signed, the kid was still set on going to Florida and when it came time to actually sign, all of the stuff we had been telling him must have clicked because he ended up picking LSU. But for him it didn't matter what visit he went on first or last. When that right school comes along where the kid feels comfortable, they get their heart set on that place. Whether it's the school, the stadium, the coaches or whatever, once they find that one place that fits, that's where they want to go. Once that right school makes an impression, that impression stays. The schools that come after have to surpass his current happiness with the school he's set on at the time. In my experience coaching, all of the kids that i've coached that have gone on to play college football whether it was Theo Riddick going to Notre Dame or a kid going to play 1aa ball somewhere, the time at which they had their visit didn't have much impact. It was more where they felt comfortable, where they would have the best chance to succeed, and what those closest to them were putting in their ear. That's why i'm saying having a recruit come in later in the year for a visit shouldn't be THAT much of a boost over if he visited earlier. A 700-800 point boost is a lot. That's all i'm saying, just seems like they're placing too more importance/reward on certain things.

The big bonus doesn't guarantee a commit and doesn't even guarantee a better visit. Bonuses such as complimentary visits, good stats by the recruits position, rivalry and conference games, and the royal treatment skill could overcome that 700 bonus (which was just an example anyway). If you look at one of the screens in the blog, you will notice the first visit had 600 points, the second was 550 and the third was 600. We don't know all the details of those visits, but it seems more than possible to still have a very good early visit that can overcome or at least mitigate the advantages of the late ones.

[DirtyJerz32]

Quote: Originally Posted by BenGerman

Thought that was really interesting. The whole system seems really well done, if it works as advertised.

I love that too. Bring in a QB and WR should be a good thing and IRL it does. While bring in two QB's at the same time would be harmful. Love that element.

[jello1717]

My favorite part of the new recruiting is the deal breakers. If a kid is really interested in getting an education and I coach at a party school like ASU, the recruit shouldn't even take my phone calls and it's great to see that implemented in the game.

[N.C.State]

Quote: Originally Posted by jello1717

My favorite part of the new recruiting is the deal breakers. If a kid is really interested in getting an education and I coach at a party school like ASU, the recruit shouldn't even take my phone calls and it's great to see that implemented in the game.

Except the deal breaker needs to be a grade lower than C+. I don't think there are any programs with an education grade that low and if there are it is few and far between. I have a feeling that deal breakers will only pose a real problem for smaller programs.

[Strategizer]

Quote: Originally Posted by N.C.State

Except the deal breaker needs to be a grade lower than C+. I don't think there are any programs with an education grade that low and if there are it is few and far between. I have a feeling that deal breakers will only pose a real problem for smaller programs.

Small correction, but I believe it is C+ or below. Also, things like playing time and proximity to home can be dealbreakers even with the major programs. That said, the dealbreakers should have a greater effect on the small programs, as their pool of available recruits who are interested should be more limited.