NBA 2K13 Ratings - Dwight Howard – 96, Chris Bosh - 83, Roy Hibbert - 86

[SteboSSK]

Al Jefferson is more polished than Shaq was so that means 0.

On a per 36 min scale (so they are compared evenly)

Hibbert: 15.5ppg, 12.4FG per , .497FG

Howard: 19.4ppg, 12.6FG per, .573 FG

This proves being more "polished" means 0 when Dwight is much more efficient as a scorer and is actually the 2nd most efficient finisher in the pick and roll. If you want to sound the least bit intelligent it would be best to back away from the argument that more polished is anything of substance. Hell Rik Smits was more polished than Shaq. Hibbert is an average offensive player and above average defender and great shot blocker by todays standards.

[icemanfrost]

Quote: Originally Posted by SteboSSK

Al Jefferson is more polished than Shaq was so that means 0. On a per 36 min scale (so they are compared evenly) Hibbert: 15.5ppg, 12.4FG per , .497FG Howard: 19.4ppg, 12.6FG per, .573 FG This proves being more "polished" means 0 when Dwight is much more efficient as a scorer and is actually the 2nd most efficient finisher in the pick and roll. If you want to sound the least bit intelligent it would be best to back away from the argument that more polished is anything of substance. Hell Rik Smits was more polished than Shaq. Hibbert is an average offensive player and above average defender and great shot blocker by todays standards.

Polished meaning skilled doesn't necceserily mean stats
Hibbert has a better post up game and jumpshot hence more polished offensively never said more better overall player
Wow people really dont read or I guess the interpetation is wrong

[SteboSSK]

Another thing I noticed. You said Al Jefferson would be the top big man in the league? Are you aware that he is a year older than Dwight and has been in the league the same amount of time? If he hasnt gotten there yet he will never get there. Al has a nice offensive game and is a good player but his impact is not felt on the court to even be considered elite. Just go to bed man....

[raul24NDLAL12]

Quote: Originally Posted by SteboSSK

Another thing I noticed. You said Al Jefferson would be the top big man in the league? Are you aware that he is a year older than Dwight and has been in the league the same amount of time? If he hasnt gotten there yet he will never get there. Al has a nice offensive game and is a good player but his impact is not felt on the court to even be considered elite. Just go to bed man....

Lol Al Jefferson being the top big man in the league that's why they drafted another center ROLF! not@you but the other person.

[SteboSSK]

Quote: Originally Posted by icemanfrost

Polished meaning skilled doesn't necceserily mean stats Hibbert has a better post up game and jumpshot hence more polished offensively never said more better overall player Wow people really dont read or I guess the interpetation is wrong

Who cares tho. What does it mean it terms of results? You stated that to compare his game to Dwight's in order to point out that he is better offensively. The facts I posted disprove your theory. Him being more "polished" means jack ish if he isnt getting the ball in the hoop more and on less attempts on the same type of shots Dwight is taking.

[icemanfrost]

Have of Howard's game and what really makes him good is his physicality that has nothing to do with polish
You basically took what I said about a few attributes and like a chick went to the extreme with it
Rik Smits did have more skill than Shaq
But the quality of big men are so low I really think Rik Smits if he played today would easily avg. 20 and 10
Dont get me wrong I was the main one speaking that Dwight should be considered for MVP every year but that is what the NBA does it loves to market the small guys over the big guys
Truth be told the lack of quality big men are the reason the NBA quality of play has went down

[icemanfrost]

Why are people taking more polish means better player

[SteboSSK]

Quote: Originally Posted by icemanfrost

Have of Howard's game and what really makes him good is his physicality that has nothing to do with polish You basically took what I said about a few attributes and like a chick went to the extreme with it Rik Smits did have more skill than Shaq But the quality of big men are so low I really think Rik Smits if he played today would easily avg. 20 and 10 Dont get me wrong I was the main one speaking that Dwight should be considered for MVP every year but that is what the NBA does it loves to market the small guys over the big guys Truth be told the lack of quality big men are the reason the NBA quality of play has went down

You are more delusional than I thought to think that today Smits would be a 20 10 guy. The man's best rb season was like 7rpg. It has nothing to do with the era. The guys of the 90s and before were better post player and the shot blocking stats had more to do with the way the game was played (lack of zone). Rebounds not so much. Smits would be just as much of a stiff today as he was then. Dwight's physicality is a plus to his game but so is Hibbert's height. You are doing nothing for your argument man. In the end results matter. Dwight is a better offensive player in every sense of the word.