NBA Live 13 Screenshots - Captured From First Look Trailer

[HoosierDaddy]

Obviously there are many factors; camera being used as opposed to extracting an image from a video, height of elevation when camera shot is taken, allowing more light to enter the lens on real-life shot (exposure, white balance, etc..)

It's really not fair to compare the two, I'm merely stating that the shadows/skin tones on the players doesn't need to be so drastic on the court itself. Again, I think if EA tones down the skin tones a few clicks and doesn't make the sweat "progression" so intense, they'd be better off in terms of graphics.

[ccoaxum]

ok cool..like your points

[HoosierDaddy]

Quick skin tone change. I also made some subtle changes to the muscle definition on his left arm. Which one is more life-like to all of you?

[nyj721]

That adjusted one looks awesome

[PurePlayinSerb]

hey on behalf of everyone with 20/20 vision... these graphics suck!!!

[jj06]

lol @ sweat progression..yall better be worried about gameplay.

[Boilerbuzz]

Quote: Originally Posted by PurePlayinSerb

hey on behalf of everyone with 20/20 vision... these graphics suck!!!

I disagree. The faces are VERY close and the lighting is good. It's not perfect, but I don't expect any game to have perfect lighting because modeling light exactly is still a growing science. I think the faces are quite excellent - the point of HoosierDaddy's post. The models as a whole can be debated.

[RayDog253]

Quote: Originally Posted by HoosierDaddy

Contrast does sim to be a bit off. The crowd looks grayish and the court isn't bright enough.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD