NBA 2K13 Top 20 Players and Possible Player Ratings

[Itsfuntobethespurs]

Quote: Originally Posted by keator

shhhh the heat and thunder stans do not like when you say truthful comments about their players.

I'm a Spurs fan from Argentina. I saw what KD can do both in the NBA and Fiba play against my teams. Hate the guy lol

[BEARYChi]

Westbrook should be a solid 90...i still think he not better than Rose (despite injury)

[slowdifference]

Quote: Originally Posted by keator

2012-2013 season im taking rondo or westbrook for several reasons. Age, speed, athletisms, and not injury prone. Wade is an old 11 year vet, bc the of the way he played his first few years in the league, he cant make it thru a whole seasons, and isnt someone you would want to carry your team. He is a great compliment player, similar to kobe in the early 00s with Shaq. Saying a guy is a B level star doesnt mean he will suck, it means he cant be the first option of a contending team anymore.

I give you that Wade isn't a number one anymore. I will say if Westbrook is your number 1 you have problems. As far as Rondo goes when push comes to shove I can't see him as a true number 1 cause his shooting holds him back too much.

[chandlerbang]

Quote: Originally Posted by SouthBeach

That was April, 2012 while he had a knee issue. Try again.

Bro stop defending every post related to heat players

[thelakeshow]

Why don't people get that the order of NBA 2k ratings has nothing to do with the order of the best players in the NBA? Also the whole Westbrook vs Rose ratings debate has nothing to do with who's really better in real life. They are both extremely athletically gifted, are great pgs, and they are very simular players, but Westbrooks gets a boost because he is the better defender and one of the best rebounding pgs in the nba. That's it. It doesn't mean one is better than the other, it just means in NBA 2k ratings, Westbrooks overall ratings are higher.

Also #'s 13-20 are rated 87 overall. Does that mean there aren't more players rated 87 overall?

[Can I live]

BACK TO TOPIC

yes i do agree with these ratings so, I don't see anything wrong that jumps out at me right now with them so far so good. But isn't he in his fourth year with his my player so couldn't these ratings be altered or am I mistaking ???

[Itsfuntobethespurs]

Quote: Originally Posted by Can I live

BACK TO TOPIC yes i do agree with these ratings so, I don't see anything wrong that jumps out at me right now with them so far so good. But isn't he in his fourth year with his my player so couldn't these ratings be altered or am I mistaking ???

Nash would be 43 then. So I don't think so

[nova91]

Aaaannndd there it is again, a new video drops and people flip out and start speculating and attacking each other over a 1/2 second glimpse of something that was or was not in the video.