NBA 2K13 Ratings: Steve Nash - 87, Danny Granger - 84, Kenneth Faried - 76

[Neoda2khead]

Quote: Originally Posted by 718_R3loaded

1- Nash is to high, if he plays very well for a period of time during the season will 2k boost his overall to 90? imagine that Nash, kobe, Howard all in 90's ratings everyone will suck off the Lakers online 2- Granger- Danny G ain't no scrub player a 84 seems just about right for him 3- Faried -76 fair enough he was one of the better/impressive rookies out the 2011-2012 draft class (Faried, Irving, Shumpert, Leonard, Rubio, Kemba, Klay Thompson, Brooks, all deserve fair ratings they had good seasons as rookies. _________________________ (signature skills They should have) Nash- Dimer, Floor General, ally ooper Granger- Spot up shooter, Deadeye, Shot creator Faried -Scrapper, Hustle points, Break starter (Maybe)

Nash's pass rating is prolly gonna be high he might not need alley ooper

[grahf21]

I'm fine with Nash rating since Nash is the purest of pure point guards, but Nash doesn't come close to Parker as an overall player in the year 2012.

[icemanfrost]

Quote: Originally Posted by SteboSSK

How is this a typical Laker fan reply when any Suns fan would argue the same. Tony Parker was in the MVP race b/c the Spurs were racking up wins. Thats how the MVP works. Nash is better than Parker in every area of offense outside of finishing at the rim. Its that simple. If you want to debate the facts then lets do that but arguing your feelings and taking shots at what team a person roots for takes away from the real debate.

You do know that overall takes into a count physical things also like speed and quickness also parker better than nash in every defensive stat maybe except taking charges but they dont have a category for that
We you count Parkers physical advantages with his defensive advantages over nash case close that is why parker should be rated higher
I am gonna let the people who dont watch the spurs that much in on a little secret if they were on other teams parker and ginobli they would put up superstar numbers but they play with in the system and go look at the head to.head matchup with parker and nash he destroys nash
Nash is the only player i think in the history of the NBA that get hall of fame talk without having a shred of defense him and dirk was kinda in the same boat until the last few years were dirk got a little toughness and learned to be a respectable defender

[sactown_13]

Quote: Originally Posted by Shumpert21

faried ain't a flashy dunker , nor a posterizer , or acrobat. atleast for now he isn't.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7mbcxyDcu0

ya sure about that? the whole video is good but cut to the 2:50 mark

[sactown_13]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsIbqm9whY4

and again at 1:50 mark

[IplayReal]

I just don't see Nash at that high of a level still, it's like when he won the MVP awards he played a very good point guard game...but he did what point guards are supposed to do, not sure if that warranted two MVP awards (separate but similar topic).

[hamcassell]

Quote: Originally Posted by TJ820

Signature Skills are Steve Nash- Dimer, Floor General, Deadeye, Spot up Shooter Danny Granger- Spot up Shooter, Active Hands, Heat Retention Kenneth Faried- Hustle Points, Scrapper, Active Hands

I'm the biggest Nash fan alive, but how could he get Spot up shooter? That's one thing he never does on the court ever.