Madden NFL 13 Player Ratings - Top 10 Quarterbacks

[riggs6taters]

Quote: Originally Posted by k2thaz

whatever drugs ur on I want some if you think Romo is underrated. Obviously a cowboy fan.

Care to give reasons/facts or just make erroneous claims and jokes?

The 97 QB rating is a fact, the playoff wins are part of the TEAM. Hence the reason a terrible QB like Eli can have 2 rings.

[eds133]

Wish they would've broken down the ratings more.. like their throw power and accuracy and stuff. I wonder if Big Ben is that high because of the new physical rating and him fitting his scheme...I want to see how their ratings break down though.. i bet that could shed some light on how their ratings are what they are.

[StrawHat Patriot]

Quote: Originally Posted by riggs6taters

Eli Manning a 97?? Dude is closer to 77. Wow so is every player on the defense 99s and I don't even want to know what Hicks and Cruz will be...good gosh. Another obvious and downright clown rating is Arrestedberger, how can you even think he is a 95? Romo is underrated if anything, all he did was have MVP numbers and add to his 97 career QB rating. Ben - 92 QB rating for career Eli - 82 QB rating for career (lol)

That's the problem with the ratings in general. Is it based on last year, their whole career, or next season?

[43M]

Quote: Originally Posted by StreetCarp

IMO, it should go like this: Rodgers 98 Brady 97 Brees 97 Stafford 95 E. Manning 94 P. Manning 93 Romo 92 Roethlisberger 91 Ryan 88 Rivers 87

Stafford should not be a 95 based on one season where all he did most of the year was throw the ball up to an uncoverable WR.

Staffod led the league in bad decision percentage and was one had alot of bad throws to Megatron that he got bailed out on.

Put him at 90 and I can agree with those ratings.

[43M]

Quote: Originally Posted by raiders81tim

Eli vastly overrated same for Ben. No way either of these two are better than Phillip Rivers.

If Ben and Eli are overrated, what does that make the guy who only puts up big stats against poor defenses and chokes when the team needs him the most.

Ill take the two clutch winners over the stat monster any day.

[StrawHat Patriot]

If you're basing it off last season and going in to this year (in terms of skill set, stats, circumstances, and the production with their talent):

Aaron Rodgers 89
Tom Brady 87
Drew Brees 85
Eli Manning 85
Tony Romo 85
Phillip Rivers 84
Ben Roethlisberger 83
Michael Vick 82
Matthew Stafford 82

Peyton Manning 82

For their careers:

Tom Brady 95
Peyton Manning 95

Aaron Rodgers 86
Drew Brees 85


Tony Romo 83
Phillip Rivers 83
Ben Roethlisberger 81
Eli Manning 81
Matthew Stafford 80
Michael Vick 77

[btemp]

Quote: Originally Posted by StrawHat Patriot

If you're basing it off last season and going in to this year (in terms of skill set, stats, circumstances, and the production with their talent): Aaron Rodgers 89 Tom Brady 87 Drew Brees 85 Eli Manning 85 Tony Romo 85 Phillip Rivers 84 Ben Roethlisberger 83 Michael Vick 82 Matthew Stafford 82 Peyton Manning 82 For their careers: Tom Brady 95 Peyton Manning 95 Aaron Rodgers 86 Drew Brees 85 Eli Manning 81 Tony Romo 83 Phillip Rivers 83 Ben Roethlisberger 81 Matthew Stafford 80 Michael Vick 77

I'd scale it up a little, maybe Rodgers at 95, but overall I agree.

The irony is that if you were to spread the ratings out a lot more, and remove so many players from the 90+ range, players would be more unique. A big reason players currently aren't is because so many of them are clustered around the same point range resulting in the same play.

[bspang2]

Tony Romo is a 90 Overall???? BASED ON WHAT? Tony Romo has not proven himself as a winner or a clutch QB for years and has only reached the playoffs twice and has never made it past the first round of the playoffs.