NCAA Football 13 Heisman Challenge Webcast Introduces Reaction Time

[chipper_kobe]

Quote: Originally Posted by jp7588

Speak for yourself. I'm plenty happy with my life, thank you very much. I'm also a consumer in the market for a good college football game and I'm not going to spare my thoughts on a product to avoid hurting someone's feelings.

Exactly! Your thoughts, not facts, not pin point accurate to a fault rationale, just your thoughts. All of you have opinions and that's great but it doesn't make you right.

Liking something some of you don't isn't apocalyptic...

Quote: Originally Posted by CT Pittbull

that is because the mods are just as mad as the rest of us for obvious reasons ...havent seen much on here that has crossed the line just the truth of how people feel about the progress of this title ...a lot of people on here put a lot of time in with realistic suggestions to make this game better and more real and are ultimately ignored ...EA asks for our feedback and suggestions then proceeds to ignore their hardcore fan base for a casual gamer that doesnt know any better that eats up the "back of the box" features

If that were the case they wouldn't be doing their jobs

The mods here do a great job tho, this site is very well policed most of the time

[illwill10]

This is something I wont touch at all and I doubt I will accidently click on it. I didnt play the Legends mode in NBA2k at all. Just not my thing. But, some may get enjoyment out of it.

Even though I play RTG alot, I dont plan on using the Reaction Time. I dont want a easier way to play. If I wanted that, I would play on Freshman.

The only thing I am waiting for before demo is June 4th and hopefully Teambuilder improvements. I liked Teambuilder because it was something to do before the game came out, but that is about it. As for RTG, The only 2 things I want is Custom Quarter Lengths and Better CPU Playcalling

[volstopfan14]

Quote: Originally Posted by N51_rob

Features like this....I can't speak for all NCAA gamers, but is/was there really a community or group of people that were calling for this feature/mode? If so, is this really the way that that group wanted it to be done? Here take (X) player with ratings over 100 and add him to your team, and go nuts. I just don't understand how this idea made it out of their initial meeting when resources, budget and man-power were divided. It's asinine to me that we have this mode, taking up resources yet we still can't have 85 man rosters, proper pass protections, WR/DB interactions. Penalties. Its like EA is saying "yeah we hear what you guys want improved, but how do you like this." Watching this I felt like I was in one of those Car Fax commercials. "Show me the Car Fax." "Here did you see our Car Fox."

This is what really concerns me. It is like they do not care at all what the gamers want. I've never once seen anyone ask for a Heisman Mode while many other things get left out year after year. I'm sure that some people will enjoy this, but I highly doubt anyone decides to buy the game because of it and no one would have complained if it had been left out.

[moylan1234]

I'd be shocked if it was even mentioned in any wishlist. Has anyone really played EA football over the last 20 years and thought to themselves "what this game needs is some bullet time right now"?

Also, has user offensive production been an issue at any point in the series to the point that people need artificial help to move the ball?

[BA2929]

This is nearly exactly the same as what EA did with the Legends in NHL 12, outside of the Bullet Time thing. I really enjoyed putting those guys in my Be A GM mode and destroying every team I played. Even used a few in the Be a Pro mode. So, I'll definitely give this a shot until rosters come out. Maybe I'll like it, maybe I won't play it more than a few days, but I'm not going to say it's horrible and a waste of disk space until I give it a shot.

Actually, I'll never say it's a waste of disk space even if I think it's the dumbest mode ever. Maybe someone else will love it to death. Hey, to each his own, right?

[DorianDonP]

Quote: Originally Posted by chipper_kobe

Exactly! Your thoughts, not facts, not pin point accurate to a fault rationale, just your thoughts. All of you have opinions and that's great but it doesn't make you right. Liking something some of you don't isn't apocalyptic... If that were the case they wouldn't be doing their jobs The mods here do a great job tho, this site is very well policed most of the time

Are "you guys will never be happy" and "you guys have a sad life" not your thoughts?

Why can you express your like, but you don't want others to express their dislike?

[DorianDonP]

Quote: Originally Posted by BA2929

This is nearly exactly the same as what EA did with the Legends in NHL 12. I really enjoyed putting those guys in my Be A GM mode and destroying every team I played. Even used a few in the Be a Pro mode. So, I'll definitely give this a shot until rosters come out. Maybe I'll like it, maybe I won't play it more than a few days, but I'm not going to say it's horrible and a waste of disk space until I give it a shot. Actually, I'll never say it's a waste of disk space even if I think it's the dumbest mode ever. Maybe someone else will love it to death. Hey, to each his own, right?

I think that's a poor way to look at it, IMO. There will be people that will like everything. I'm sure someone liked ET the video game on Atari.

But shouldn't EA be trying to appeal to the greatest number of people?

If EA makes a feature that 100 people like, and dont implement a feature that 1,000 people would have liked, wouldn't the feature be a waste of space because it took away from what 900 more would have enjoyed?

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your stance.

[moylan1234]

Quote: Originally Posted by chipper_kobe

The mods here do a great job tho, this site is very well policed most of the time

And it's still being very well policed right now. Most people are criticizing this feature, but they're not just bashing EA over the head or disrespecting anyone. Their giving honest feedback and there's nothing wrong with that