NCAA Football 13 Heisman Challenge Webcast Introduces Reaction Time

[BA2929]

Quote: Originally Posted by Td1984

I'm looking forward to trying out the QBs first. Put Flutie on Notre Dame, Charlie Ward on Oregon, not sure where I'd try Plunkett or Ware at (probably some Air Raid or Run & Shoot school). Would also be a good way to try out the RB position (never done it in RTG before). Put Barry on Texas and maybe Archie Griffin on Michigan.

I'm going to put Barry Sanders on Kansas. Maybe I'll be able to squeak out 5 wins.....

[Osceola]

Quote: Originally Posted by hurricanefootball4

Couple of key differences though - Michael Jordan is immortalized, and pretty much anyone who ever played basketball wanted the experience to 'be like Mike'. As they admitted in the webcast, a lot of the people playing the game think Desmond Howard is just some guy on College Gameday. The only one that even intrigues me a little bit to play as is Barry Sanders...buuuuuut (and it's a huge but)....he doesn't play like Barry Sanders! NBA 2K captured Jordan's mannerisms, moves, etc almost perfectly. There were times I played that mode and I was like wow, I remember the game that Jordan did that move. Barry Sanders isn't going to be low to the ground, shifty, and making the most ridiculous juke moves you've ever seen. He's going to play like a cheese version of any other running back in NCAA Football 13. NBA 2K had great dynasty and gameplay before they need to 'shake things up' with a mode like the Jordan Challenges. NCAA still has a lot of work to do in those areas so it's frustrating to see them create a mode like this now, and then to not implement in a way that it doesn't feel like a modified version of RTG (which it is). I just feel like this development time could have been better used elsewhere.

LOL, yea it was amazing when 2k had Jordan's box looking jersey that floated away from his body just like real life....oh wait that's that weird looking 2k thing that poeple overlook when it says 2k on the box.....just like all it's all other flaws.

Don't let the door hit you guys on the way out! Why keep posting if you already said 43 times "I'm not buying this year" "not a buy for me" blah blah blah man.

[UH53]

Quote: Originally Posted by jpdavis82

I give up, your whole rant was about NCAA 12 equipment and details vs Madden 12 equipment and details. The equipment is right in Madden because the developers have the license and have to focus more on what the players look like than they do in NCAA. Madden will ALWAYS have more accurate equipment and player models.

Ok. Let's take your argument to the teams that NCAA does have a license to. Florida has blue cleats... Wrong! Washington doesn't have a gold trim on their purple uni's... Wrong! Last year the hype was about getting ASU's new uni's in but they forgot to make them a member of the PAC-12 with the missing patches that everybody else had even the two new members CU and Utah! This may seem simple to you and a cosmetic oversite but to the fan of that particular team.... They got screwed! What's even more disturbing is that teams like Florida and UW have history in CFB of being relevant ie Nat'l championships but EA still gets them wrong.... Really! After you buy this years game turn the box around to see who's license they have!

[lsutygurfan]

Quote: Originally Posted by Gotmadskillzson

You could create a Heisman player in NCAA 12, give him 99's in various ratings and you will have NCAA 13 Heisman Mode minus the interview videos.

This is exactly what I was thinking.

If i do buy this game, i'll try my best navigate my gamepad away from this mode.

Pointless waste of disc space.

[BigSho31]

I used to get bent out of shape about these things and rant and rave. But honestly...I've completely given up on EA football games in this generation. Hopefully next generation they'll give us our money's worth.

I didn't read all the posts prior to this...but am I the only person who made this correlation: if the guy playing the demo is terrible and that's who's showcasing the game, doesn't that go against actually making the game better?

I don't know...just a thought.

[Playmakers]

Quote: Originally Posted by Pezell04x

Look pretty good to me (taken from the trailer):

I like what they did to Walker....In fact that is the only face mask in the game that can come close to what he wore back in those days.

I know because i created the same exact gear for Walker back in NCAA 11
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...-11-a-236.html

Scroll all the way to the next to last post you'll see Walker's Picture i posted of him in NCAA 11 the exact same gear EA has in NCAA 13 for him.

Even for their Desmond Howard version i agree with both almost identical

EA's version of Desmond Howard's gear
http://www.operationsports.com/media...reenshot-19997

My version of Desmond Howard's gear
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...-11-a-239.html

The only thing again that i have a problem with is their willingness to give all players 100 overall ratings not their gear.

[UH53]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigSho31

I used to get bent out of shape about these things and rant and rave. But honestly...I've completely given up on EA football games in this generation. Hopefully next generation they'll give us our money's worth. I didn't read all the posts prior to this...but am I the only person who made this correlation: if the guy playing the demo is terrible and that's who's showcasing the game, doesn't that go against actually making the game better? I don't know...just a thought.

Lol! Agreed!

[capn_razzamataz]

Quote: Originally Posted by Osceola

LOL, yea it was amazing when 2k had Jordan's box looking jersey that floated away from his body just like real life....oh wait that's that weird looking 2k thing that poeple overlook when it says 2k on the box.....just like all it's all other flaws. Don't let the door hit you guys on the way out! Why keep posting if you already said 43 times "I'm not buying this year" "not a buy for me" blah blah blah man.

If THAT is the issue you choose to make a point about NBA2k, then I think they're doing pretty darn well.