MLB 12 The Show Franchise Mode Improvements

[loganmorrison1]

Quote: Originally Posted by Marino

And i think its time for you to drop it, its not that big of a deal. Sent from Hayden Panettiere's #1 fan

You're right, I should definitely listen to you b/c you know what is important.

[Marino]

Quote: Originally Posted by loganmorrison1

You're right, I should definitely listen to you b/c you know what is important.

Seeing as how I am a moderator, yes you do. If you don't we can show you the exit.

Sent from Hayden Panettiere's #1 fan

[TheKnack]

*Raises right hand*
"Yellow card sir!"

Back on topic...

I love the new rebuilding/contender interface. So awesome.
I cannot wait to trade Ichiro from the M's and get some serious prospects. Hopefully Mike Trout!

[TheKnack]

Quote: Originally Posted by WSUCougars

*Raises right hand* "Yellow card sir!" Back on topic... I love the new rebuilding/contender interface. So awesome. I cannot wait to trade Ichiro from the M's and get some serious prospects. Hopefully Mike Trout!

Wait... will Trout be considered a prospect still do you think? I'd guess so.

[BatsareBugs]

Quote: Originally Posted by Knight165

Well...I've proposed(to Kolbe...so I'll resend it to Aaron) a system that would be something like this..... (it's "stolen" from Minor League Analyst....but I think it's perfect for gaming) Potential would be.... 10. Hall of Famer(VERY few would get this rating) 9. Elite Player 8. Solid regular 7. Average player 6. Platoon player 5. MLB reserve 4. Top Minor Leaguer 3. Average Minor Leaguer 2. Minor League Reserve 1. Roster Filler Then there would be a probability rating of that potential and how likely a player would be to reach it. This would drive his range of growth as well(better rating...better the likely jump) A. 90% chance of reaching potential B. 70% chance of reaching potential C. 50% chance of reaching potential D. 30% chance of reaching potential E. 10% chance of reaching potential There would also be a +/- to that letter to fill in between chances. This would make every aspect of player evaluation much more intriguing. At draft....Draft the 9C player....who might be the next Verlander....the next Hamilton or go with the 8A guy who is a "lock" to get to the MLB level and contribute solidly to your ballclub It could be dynamic.....and also be dependent on how good your scout is too see such a rating. So...I still think that progression should be programmed in ......but how that progression/regression is handed out should be dependent on some new criteria. M.K. Knight165

I remember seeing you bring this up a while back Knight and I think it'd be a fitting system. Some people feel like every player reaches their potential in the current system and that there aren't any A potential or B potential players that never reach it, but a system like this would certainly help with prospects.

[Knight165]

Quote: Originally Posted by loganmorrison1

I'm sorry, I'm not buying this. He's as much Michael Stanton as Issac Davis is Ike or Gabriel Hernandez is Gabby. I love SCEA and everything they do, but mistakes do happen, we don't need to cover-up for everything

Haha...

A COVERUP!!!

Call out the C.I.A. and Mi-5!

What I was saying is....what's the big deal?
Not....they are right.....and someone else is wrong.

You guys are friggin' nuts.

M.K.
Knight165

[BatsareBugs]

I remember when Mike Gonzalez changed his name to Michael Gonzalez, the change wasn't reflected immediately. Tony Gwynn Jr. was still Tony Gwynn Jr. despite getting changed to just Tony Gwynn when he came to the Padres.

I know he's goes by Mike Stanton, but each time I see that I think of the reliever Mike Stanton.

[TheKnack]

God, so much young talent in baseball right now... really gets me excited for the game.