Madden NFL 12 Ratings - Top 5 Running Backs

[Gravit]

Quote: Originally Posted by Broncos86

Glad to see AP over CJ.

CJ is better and should be rated the same or higher than AP. He's faster, more elusiveness, and doesn't put the ball on the ground. He also doesn't share carries. And in a bad year where every defense focused only on him, he still racks up over 1300 yards.

AP is stronger but that's about the only thing he's got over CJ.

[nyj721]

Quote: Originally Posted by Gravit

CJ is better and should be rated the same or higher than AP. He's faster, more elusiveness, and doesn't put the ball on the ground. He also doesn't share carries. And in a bad year where every defense focused only on him, he still racks up over 1300 yards. AP is stronger but that's about the only thing he's got over CJ.

Believe it or not, Johnson had more fumbles than AP last year.

[Scott812313]

Quote: Originally Posted by at23steelers

Should put Foster on list at 94 overall and make Charles a 92 overall.

Seriously? Charles is the 2nd best back in the league behind AD. Nobody churns out yardage like he does.

[happymadison]

I believe jamaal's rating is just right, the man rushed for 1,467 yard's and carried the ball only 230 time's, now to me that's impressive...as for foster he did win the rushing title but he also carried the ball 327 time's, i mean he carried the ball 97 more time's than charles....thats like having at least 3 more game carries than charles because a Rb avg's 25 to 30 carries a game...so charles should be where he is if not higher ranked.

[bmj2k7]

Glad to see foster not in the top 5, do it 1 year its a fluke, do it 2 years luck but do it 3 years and its consistency, maybe in another year or 2 we'll see foster in the top 5 if he keeps it up, but glad to see jackson get some love, and with Bradford's new weapons i'm sure he'll have lanes to run in this year to keep him in the top 5, when last year he opened things up for Bradford, now he's returning the favor!

[Fiasco West]

Quote: Originally Posted by happymadison

I believe jamaal's rating is just right, the man rushed for 1,467 yard's and carried the ball only 230 time's, now to me that's impressive...as for foster he did win the rushing title but he also carried the ball 327 time's, i mean he carried the ball 97 more time's than charles....thats like having at least 3 more game carries than charles because a Rb avg's 25 to 30 carries a game...so charles should be where he is if not higher ranked.

Just because Charles avg more yards on less carries doesn't mean he would have kept it up with 97 more carries....thats a ton more carries and any avg is likely to drop and anything is likely to happen in 97 or so more carries.

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Fiasco West

Just because Charles avg more yards on less carries doesn't mean he would have kept it up with 97 more carries....thats a ton more carries and any avg is likely to drop and anything is likely to happen in 97 or so more carries.

Even if he only averaged 2 yards per carry for those last 97 carries, I'm pretty sure that still would have been enough to beat Arian Foster if what other people have been posting were their actual stats.

[Seanzie]

People are shocked that Charles is rated that highly when the dude has run for like 2,400+ yards over the past two seasons, caught a ****-ton of passes, and averages like 6+ ypc? Seriously? ARIAN FOSTER?

Puke.