Madden NFL 12 Team Ratings - AFC West (ESPN)

[BigSpleen]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

With the exception of possibly Seymour none of those players are great. Some of them are pretty good, but none are great.. McFadden could be, need to see him play like that more than just one year. Bush is a nice player and a banger but he's not a great player. Ford and McClain had nice rookie years, but it's way to early to call them great as well. If you look at the Raiders roster they have some talent, but not a lot of depth and there certainly are holes on the roster. At least on paper.

the same can be said of 7-8 teams rated higher, again its not rocket science.........................

[BigSpleen]

Quote: Originally Posted by PowerPitcher

Total ignorance? LOL Well sir, your WHOLE ARGUMENT is ignorant, if the Raiders where in fact the team you claim they are, they would have a record that showed it. A few good players, doesn't make a good team, I will be willing to bet you $100 the Raiders don't make the playoffs this year.

The same can be said of many teams rated higher then the raiders, your comprehension skills kick in yet?

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigSpleen

the same can be said of 7-8 teams rated higher, again its not rocket science.........................

It's certainly not rocket science, because science is basically just that, for the most part black or white.

This is purely subjective, you can't say definitively one way or another, particularly before a single game is played one team is definitely better than the other.

Unless you believe your opinion to be fact and can not be questioned.

[BigSpleen]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

It's certainly not rocket science, because science is basically just that, for the most part black or white. This is purely subjective, you can't say definitively one way or another, particularly before a single game is played one team is definitely better than the other. Unless you believe your opinion to be fact and can not be questioned.

It is fact, sorry, the chiefs rated 10 points higher is baloney. Who ever did these ratings does not have a good knowledge of NFl rosters and are using the last 6-7 years were the raiders struggled instead of what the team is as of right now. The comment about DHB shows this.

[BigSpleen]

Quote: Originally Posted by PowerPitcher

Total ignorance? LOL Well sir, your WHOLE ARGUMENT is ignorant, if the Raiders where in fact the team you claim they are, they would have a record that showed it. A few good players, doesn't make a good team, I will be willing to bet you $100 the Raiders don't make the playoffs this year.

The point is you said the raiders ar a team full f athletes not football players, I asked you to name one besides DHB and you could not........ ignorance yep.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigSpleen

It is fact, sorry, the chiefs rated 10 points higher is baloney. Who ever did these ratings does not have a good knowledge of NFl rosters and are using the last 6-7 years were the raiders struggled instead of what the team is as of right now. The comment about DHB shows this.

Subjective ratings can not be factual. Hence the reason they are subjective.

It's your opinion, nothing more nothing less. And your opinion holds no more weight than anyone else's.

[BigSpleen]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

Subjective ratings can not be factual. Hence the reason they are subjective. It's your opinion, nothing more nothing less. And your opinion holds no more weight than anyone else's.

except the comment he made about DHB and the raiders shows he really doesnt know the roster at all.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigSpleen

except the comment he made about DHB and the raiders shows he really doesnt know the roster at all.

In your opinion. Again, that has nothing to do with the fact you seem unable to grasp. these ratings are purely subjective. Again your opinion on NFL talent or roster talent holds no more weight than his or anyone's else.