NCAA Football 12 Roster Glitch Confirmed, Patch to Address Concerns

[dochalladay32]

Like my advisor always says, NEVER EVER add too much in at once (and put in lots of comments... which might be an issue as well). It seems that is the problem with these games. They want to shout "New new new!!!" so people will buy and we'll post for weeks on here and guys will go out for hours a week early trying to get a copy, and things occur in the shuffle and at that point, it is too hard to fix. And then we have this situation.

I'm with many of these guys: give me good sim football. Custom conferences is cool, but outside of that, I want a good game of football. Get that right, then give me some more cool things. I have not touched custom playbooks once? Why, lack of interest encouraged further by more bugs. I have 120+ playbooks to choose from as it is. I can find one to make me happy. But I can't make a custom playbook because there is too much risk for error. The same thing is liable to happen to my historical conference lineups before long, but I think I'm saved by many indepedents and small conferences for a several decades.

[PDDollars]

Quote: Originally Posted by gator3guy

I hate the wait, but maybe they should push the release date back to late July/early August. Those extra couple weeks could make a big difference. Patches seemed like they would change "next gen" gaming but in fact they probably made it worse. Maybe I was oblivious, but I don't remember these major bugs during the PS2 days.

I wouldn't mind seeing this, the game does come out 6 weeks before the season, pushing the release date back like Madden did this year would give them a couple more weeks of testing at least

[dochalladay32]

Quote: Originally Posted by PDDollars

I wouldn't mind seeing this, the game does come out 6 weeks before the season, pushing the release date back like Madden did this year would give them a couple more weeks of testing at least

And as someone said, in late July 2013, how long would they have had to work on it? The same year they have now. It would help in year one, and if they took advantage of that extra time to do a lot of cleaning, maybe we're good. But it would probably be spent adding some random feature that may not be correctly implemented.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by CarolinaCJAM

Don't get me wrong. I love Dynasty, RTG, etc. but I don't see why EA should work on all these new, fancy features until they actually get solid gameplay (No morphing, sliding into position, "ice-skating running animations", etc.). THEN you can focus on making the game pretty & attractive. Also, I don't care how much testing they have to do; FIX THE DAMN BUGS/GLITCHES.

"No morphing" on the back of a box doesnt really sell video games but I digress. Also I dont know if they would have found this bug if they hired 500 new beta testers. Shoot, there are tens of thousands of people who visit this forum and this bug wasnt found until yesterday and the game has been out for almost than two weeks.

[TheShizNo1]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

Never said it wasnt a fair gripe but you cant have it both ways. Online Franchise in its self was a new feature a few years back and any addition to that is a new feature. You cant say "I want this and this added to OF" or "I want Dynamic Lighting" and then get mad if its not perfect out of the door. Those new features can sometimes cause glitches. You cant compare this gen to last gen because its different (and more complicated) hardware and software plus games with more features. Because of that these things tend to happen.

I understand where you're coming from, I do. But, it's now three years for the online franchise....something could have been added, something. I feel I can compare it when it's NCAA's now 5 iteration on it. I imagine by the 7th, more new game systems will start to emerge. So unless they knock 13 and 14 out the park, this generation, again, will be more disappointment than anything else.

[BaylorBearBryant]

Quote: Originally Posted by PDDollars

I wouldn't mind seeing this, the game does come out 6 weeks before the season, pushing the release date back like Madden did this year would give them a couple more weeks of testing at least

I vote for pushing the game up two weeks, since we have to do the testing and all.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheShizNo1

I think patching as a whole has made it worse. It's now ok to ship games out with issues knowing they can try and write over the mistake in a month or so

I prefer they way it is now. I remember one year EA decided to push back the PC release of NBA live back a few months in order to fix some bugs. Most of those bugs were things I didnt care about and would have preferred the extra two months with game. Let me decide if a bug is a gamebreaker or not.

[BaylorBearBryant]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

I prefer they way it is now. I remember one year EA decided to push back the PC release of NBA live back a few months in order to fix some bugs. Most of those bugs were things I didnt care about and would have preferred the extra two months with game. Let me decide if a bug is a gamebreaker or not.

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

I think its going a little overboard calling this HUGE or BIG, BIG. For me, HUGE is if it makes the game unplayable or the game is freezing. Its still an annoying issue no doubt. Also, if this really happens every year then the blame starts to move over to the customer. What other product would you buy every year if you know that out of the box there would be issues and that you wouldnt be satisfied with the product until a month or two after you bought it? I know I cant think of one yet every year you guys rush in mass to buy the game Day 1.

So then quit calling out people when they say it is a game breaker. Like I said earlier, if you stop buying the game, then they quit making the game...

Then you're out of any new NCAA Football game.