NCAA Football 12 Roster Glitch Confirmed, Patch to Address Concerns

[TheShizNo1]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheShizNo1

Just played against Michigan using OkSU. Heisman Matt10 sliders. Drob was notnew factor. 8 rushes for 7 yards, long of 16, sacked 5 times. Gonna test with named rosters next Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

just played against Michigan with Oregon state. Drob didn't scramble one time


EDIT: OK, when I look at the roster screen, it shows Drob as balanced. When I go to edit him, above overall, it list him as a scrambler.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

[LionsFanNJ]

Quote: Originally Posted by dochalladay32

Yea, one of them probably turned on their computer this morning, saw an e-mail pop up. *jaw drops* "Our lawsuit preventing secret is out!!! Oh no..." We talked about this pages upon pages ago. Someone used strength ratings to switch players back and it appears to work... but it was still a little fishy, and not worth the effort to flip every single tendency that was reversed.

Plus, is not exclusive to QB's either

[Gotmadskillzson]

Quote: Originally Posted by Bumble14

Not to get off topic but this issue could be completely be resolved by EA implementing a slider specifically for QB scrambling....just saying

That's been my idea for the past 5 years. I am going to trademark it

[dochalladay32]

Quote: Originally Posted by Gotmadskillzson

That's been my idea for the past 5 years. I am going to trademark it

But then wouldn't we also need sliders to go from a more finesse back to power back? Rushing lineman to coverage lineman?

I think there are enough of us here who have/do programming and we sure all know how to test games. Who wants to make a video game?

[drlw322]

Quote: Originally Posted by dochalladay32

Yea, one of them probably turned on their computer this morning, saw an e-mail pop up. *jaw drops* "Our lawsuit preventing secret is out!!! Oh no..." We talked about this pages upon pages ago. Someone used strength ratings to switch players back and it appears to work... but it was still a little fishy, and not worth the effort to flip every single tendency that was reversed.

Did some simming with the named roster without tendency change it was alot better sim running stats for QBs then the tendency change roster.

I honestly think the simming engine gathers the sim stats from their overall attribute rather than tendency. With the tendency change roster I had to lower some of their truck stick, elusiveness ability, and break tackle rating to prevent from hiking the strength rating too high.

I think that is why the non tendency change roster had better sim stats

No tendency change results








With tendency change roster

[aarontab]

Quote: Originally Posted by dochalladay32

But then wouldn't we also need sliders to go from a more finesse back to power back? Rushing lineman to coverage lineman? I think there are enough of us here who have/do programming and we sure all know how to test games. Who wants to make a video game?

100% true. That's why i just play the game as is, not because i'm 100% satisfied or anything like that, i just would prefer not to have to do all the legwork to have it be realistic. So if i can throw 4 vert bombs, i'm good. If the opposing offense only gets 30 yards total rushing, i'm good. I have a real job and real responsibilities, can't be bothered to do somebody else's job for them.

[dochalladay32]

So in the long run, you say that sim stats aren't affected? Trying to figure out why my results looked so poor last night.

[shnuskis]

	Not to get off topic but this issue could be completely be resolved by EA implementing a slider specifically for QB scrambling....just saying

So how does this help with this problem? Call me stupid but I thought the problem was switching player tendencies. Not the actual amount of times a qb scrambles. Adjusting a slider so Robinson gets 200 carries and 1,000 yards is great. But that doesn't do much good when Luck is getting as many carries as Robinson because he has been changed to a scrambler.

The scrambling seems fine to me finally. Its who's doing it now.