Madden NFL 12 Has Rated Four Players at 99. Overrated? Who Missed the Cut?

[raidertiger]

Let's assume everyone is right and Nnamdi doesn't cover number 1 receivers. Then why isn't Stanford Routt a 90+, since he must be doing it and putting up nice numbers?

[KOTC Wayne]

Quote: Originally Posted by Senator Palmer

Who's arguing for Tony Gonzalez to be 99? A 99 player should execute every aspect of his position at the highest level. Gates is probably the best receiving TE going today, he doesn't execute every aspect of the TE position at the highest level and that's not really in question. If this debate were taking place 15 years ago, I would argue against Deion Sanders being a 99 overall by virtue of his tackling, although he's definitely be 99 worth as far as man coverage, speed agility, etc.

The way the game has always been as far as players overalls is some attributes of a specific players position weigh more on the influence of that particular player Ovr than others and a TE's blocking is one of the least of factors they weigh in on that. Even in real life, I would want my CB to be able to tackle ( Deion ) but if he can't tackle that good but is superb in coverage rather it's man or zone then I will take that any day of the week.That's like saying Brady or Manning shouldn't be 99 Ovr b/c they can't scramble which is an execution the QB has to make at times. With Witten and Gates, I'm a Cowboys fan but I have to give the nod to Gates and his athletic ability plays a big factor in it.

[KOTC Wayne]

Quote: Originally Posted by Lodeus

Some are missing the point of Witten/Gates debate. Witten is the best TE in the league, Gates is not. He is just the best receiving tight end, he is practically a wide receiver playing tight end. Witten does everything a tight end should do better then anyone it the game.

True but the game doesn't factor that in like I said before and even in real life, who did the players vote the best TE today in the Top 100 voting on NFL Network? While Witten blocks better than Gates and I'm sure it's not by a long shot, Gates can take over a game in the TE position and Witten can hurt you but not in the way Gates can.

[therealsmallville]

Quote: Originally Posted by Jarodd21

Ed Reed and Peyton Manning should definitely be a 99..

With the ratings based on last year, why do you think Manning should be a 99? Not arguing with you, just curious. I would think that 3 game stretch of picks would be enough reason to keep him at 98 (and honestly...1 point of overall will not make a difference anyway. He'll play like a 99).

[Palo20]

Quote: Originally Posted by raidertiger

Let's assume everyone is right and Nnamdi doesn't cover number 1 receivers. Then why isn't Stanford Routt a 90+, since he must be doing it and putting up nice numbers?

It's not that Nnandi doesn't cover number 1 WRs, it's just that he always plays RCB. If the number 1 lines up on the left, he covers him.

Nnandi and Revis are both special players.

Using 2009 as an example, Revis covered all number 1 WRs on the opposing team and when he was thrown at, QBs had a rating of about 32.0. That was Brady to Moss, Schaub to Johnson, Manning to Wayne (for one half), Ryan to White, Matt Moore to Steve Smith, Brees to whomever Revis covered that day, etc. Revis was thrown at as much as any CB in the league and held those combos to a rating of 32.0. Was he helped by a good pass rush? Yes, but those numbers are ludicrous. He made those guys worse than Jamarcus Russell.

Now also in 2009, Nnandi was thrown at less than 2 times per game (Revis saw over 120 passes his way) . Nnadi was right around 30 throws his way. That's legitimately shutting down half the field. Obviously other teams were showing him serious respect because he's that good.

I just think Revis is a once in a generation talent to do what he is doing in the most pass happy time in league history.

And for the record, Routt had an outstanding season last year. He should have a high rating.

[..GameOver..]

I replied to a post made on the first page so I quickly deleted this since it is probably irrelevant at this point.

[mojo6911]

Quote: Originally Posted by Jarodd21

Ed Reed and Peyton Manning should definitely be a 99..

No way Manning should have a 99. He had his worst season since 2002. He didn't even have a 2:1 TD:INT ratio, his yards per attempt were the 2nd lowest of his career. The only reason he threw for a lot of yards is because he threw it 50 times more than he ever has in a season.

Compared to Brady, who only threw 4 INTs all season, had more TDs than Manning, had a yard more per attempt than Manning. Brady had one of the greatest seasons of QB play all time and was throwing to guys like Wes Welker, Danny Woodhead, and two rookie TEs.

Manning is overrated. Ed Reed, I agree, should be a 99.

[BigSpleen]

Quote: Originally Posted by R0M0mentum09

Ware is snubbed again. Witten is somehow lower than Gates? (to anyone not in the know click the link) http://tiny.cc/WittenVsGates

gates is much better then witten, not rocket science.