NCAA Football 12 Roster Glitch Confirmed, Patch to Address Concerns

[Redacted01]

Quote: Originally Posted by buckeye02

If you make a player from scratch with Denards exact ratings, what does his tendency turn out to be then?? Is his ratings truely a balanced player??? 95 speed 99 accel 90 THP 83 THA Leans towards scrambler, but still close to looking balanced. Im just curious if a player is created exactly like denard from scratch is he balanced or a scrambler.

I'm curious as well, although in the edit menu, it still says Denard is a scrambler, which is what he was on the base roster. I doubt you guys changed his ratings.

[LionsFanNJ]

give me ten minutes. I'm gonna make one from scratch in the non named roster.

EDIT: Same issue. Scrambler tendency on the edit ratings screen, back on the main screen hes Balanced.

[bgdave39]

It seems pretty clear what the issue is to me. EA's has player tendencies assigned based off certain ratings yet assigned certain tendencies in creating the rosters as "overrides" to the default tendency determining system. IE, when the rosters are edited and saved, it reverts back to the ratings based system of determining styles.

Here's hoping to an easy Tuner based fix.

[Roggie]

This one may be the final straw for me. This is definitely reaching NASCAR 2011 territory.

[MattUM2]

Quote: Originally Posted by northface28

Wait till news of this spreads and guys find out theyre wasting time making edits, theyll burn this B down. This is massive black eye for EA, even if it is fixed, this hurts, a lot. Can anyone play a option team and see if they try anything wonky? Just out of curiosity.

Yup as a editor. I just found out about this. I have one member testing my rosters. I did a dynasty sim and it looks like no QB are rushing at all.

The other positions being a problem have made me stop. I will still create my excel files in hopes that something can be fixed. If so I can plug everything in. But the past week has been a waste, plugging in information, editing hometowns, body builds, equipment.

All QB's have been edited to an exact science to play to the abilty the show on tv every saturday. But now it's doesn't look to be that way.

This needs to be fixed quick.

[Roggie]

Quote: Originally Posted by bgdave39

It seems pretty clear what the issue is to me. EA's has player tendencies assigned based off certain ratings yet assigned certain tendencies in creating the rosters as "overrides" to the default tendency determining system. IE, when the rosters are edited and saved, it reverts back to the ratings based system of determining styles. Here's hoping to an easy Tuner based fix.

This doesn't seem right at all. Players who have no business becoming scramblers are scrambling. Andrew Luck is not close to a scrambler. It's every single balanced and scrambling QB switched, not a choice few. And other positions as well.

[drlw322]

Quote: Originally Posted by dochalladay32

How many times did he put someone on their *** with his new found strength?

None actually, he got stuffed twice on the option keeper. He had a 7 yard run off a pass play that he slide on and a other option keeper for like 14 yards and slide on again

I think trucking and tackle break has more to do with it. I don't think the strength effects that much.

[Redacted01]

Quote: Originally Posted by bgdave39

It seems pretty clear what the issue is to me. EA's has player tendencies assigned based off certain ratings yet assigned certain tendencies in creating the rosters as "overrides" to the default tendency determining system. IE, when the rosters are edited and saved, it reverts back to the ratings based system of determining styles. Here's hoping to an easy Tuner based fix.

That's not it, otherwise, if I changed Denard Robinson even one point, he would become balanced in the edit menu; he is a scramber in the edit menu. There is a lost connection between the edit menu calculating him as a scrambler and the roster menu saying he is balanced. The opposite for balanced QB's. Same with power and balanced backs, etc... Something is lost in translation; it is not an override.