Home

NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

This is a discussion on NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online) within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
Why Player Ratings Change When Starting Dynasty Mode in College Football 25
What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?
The House Rules Hub for Recruiting in College Football 25 Dynasty Mode
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2011, 02:20 AM   #89
MVP
 
cparrish's Arena
 
OVR: 20
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado
Blog Entries: 2
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LionsFanNJ
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU- great Rutgers a 3* this year. Expected but makes it more of a challenge to build them up as the big east power.
As they should be. There is nothing wrong with a 3* program and face it, Rutgers is at best a 3* program.
__________________
BuffEye Rosters available on the Xbox 360 and PS3. The most in-depth roster for NCAA 14 and beyond.

Xbox 360: BuffEye Rosters
PS3: BuffEyeRosters
cparrish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:22 AM   #90
Rookie
 
acreyman's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Probably the biggest Boise fan in here, we lost a LOT of GREAT players this year and I think the team is over rated in the game, even with Kellen Moore returning. Our WR core is just no where near as good as last year, and our D lost some huge talent. Its gonna be a rough year.
acreyman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:25 AM   #91
Be Good To One Another
 
The JareBear's Arena
 
OVR: 49
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 11,574
Blog Entries: 17
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Quote:
Originally Posted by acreyman
Probably the biggest Boise fan in here, we lost a LOT of GREAT players this year and I think the team is over rated in the game, even with Kellen Moore returning. Our WR core is just no where near as good as last year, and our D lost some huge talent. Its gonna be a rough year.
I suggest waiting for one of the great custom rosters to be released before starting your dynasty.....EA tends to inflate ratings out of the box...
__________________
"Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."

OS Blog

The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.
The JareBear is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 06-09-2011, 02:26 AM   #92
MVP
 
cparrish's Arena
 
OVR: 20
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colorado
Blog Entries: 2
Re: NCAA Football 12 Team Ratings and Prestige Revealed (Tradition Sports Online)

Quote:
Originally Posted by acreyman
Probably the biggest Boise fan in here, we lost a LOT of GREAT players this year and I think the team is over rated in the game, even with Kellen Moore returning. Our WR core is just no where near as good as last year, and our D lost some huge talent. Its gonna be a rough year.
I agree 100%. I still think they will win 8 games or so, but it won't be the Boise State we are used to seeing the past four years or so.
__________________
BuffEye Rosters available on the Xbox 360 and PS3. The most in-depth roster for NCAA 14 and beyond.

Xbox 360: BuffEye Rosters
PS3: BuffEyeRosters
cparrish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:30 AM   #93
The Senator
 
buckeye02's Arena
 
OVR: 31
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,127
Blog Entries: 2
Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredlib
So explain to me when a team should finally lose a prestige star. 20 years no BCS bowl win? 30 years? Correct me if I am wrong but isn't Dame losing to Navy lately? This has to be reflected somehow right?
If they were knocked down a peg a few years i would have no problem with it....well, i dont really have a problem now.....just sayin' EA knocked them down to a 5* after they had a better year last year when EA had them still at a 6*. Doesnt make sense. ND is still a school that has a great fan base, great academics, great school tradition, still sells out home games, gets TV coverage....obviously. All that i think is why they remained a 6* program IN THE GAME for so long. I could see both arguments as to why they should still be a 6 or knocked down to a 5. I basically agreed with him about knocking ND down after a year where they had a better season than the previous. If anything they shouldve knocked them down a * after last year. Fair enough?
__________________
PSN: buckeye02

Last edited by buckeye02; 06-09-2011 at 02:34 AM.
buckeye02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:46 AM   #94
Swaggy Poole
 
justblaze09's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,528
Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Is a B+ for Michigan's D overrated, yes, but some of y'all are underrating them just a tad bit. Most of the problem with the D was the system/who was coaching it. After Mike Martin, it's a bunch of low 80s/high 70s in the starting group.

The way y'all make it sound Michigan's D should be loaded with 70s/60s in the starting lineup, and that's not the case.
__________________
Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Michigan

OS Uni Snob Association Member

OS's most random Twitter account: @JustinTrenell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruins
White doesn't clash with dark colors. Or most colors. That's the point of white.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gordogg24p
I think most of American history would disagree with you on that one.
justblaze09 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 02:49 AM   #95
The Senator
 
buckeye02's Arena
 
OVR: 31
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,127
Blog Entries: 2
Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

Quote:
Originally Posted by justblaze09
Is a B+ for Michigan's D overrated, yes, but some of y'all are underrating them just a tad bit. Most of the problem with the D was the system/who was coaching it. After Mike Martin, it's a bunch of low 80s/high 70s in the starting group.

The way y'all make it sound Michigan's D should be loaded with 70s/60s in the starting lineup, and that's not the case.
i said C+ or B- in another thread.
__________________
PSN: buckeye02
buckeye02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 06-09-2011, 03:09 AM   #96
Be Good To One Another
 
The JareBear's Arena
 
OVR: 49
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 11,574
Blog Entries: 17
Re: NCAA 12: TSO breaks down all 120 teams ratings and prestige

I think B- is definitely the highest it should be rated. To prove I am not a homer, I also think PSU is WAY overrated, they should be no higher than a B on either side
__________________
"Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."

OS Blog

The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.
The JareBear is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.
Top -