Home

New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games"

This is a discussion on New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games" within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
Why Player Ratings Change When Starting Dynasty Mode in College Football 25
What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?
The House Rules Hub for Recruiting in College Football 25 Dynasty Mode
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-19-2010, 04:51 PM   #9
Recruiting App
 
PocketScout's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,392
Re: New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games"

Quote:
Originally Posted by kjcheezhead
"However, should EA win, from what Crabtree-Ireland said above -- you would no longer have to license likenesses in sports games. So while you would still have to license teams, players would be fair game to be used without a license fee of any kind."

This sounds like a lose, lose for EA. Even if they win the right to use college likenesses, they set a precedent to allow for 2k to make a game using NFL players likenesses with generic city names.

They can do this right now, as per the Jim Brown ruling. The problem is without the NFL License (Teams, Logos), the game will not sale in mass. The players license is from the NFLPA not the NFL license.
__________________
NCAA 2014: Current Dynasty
PocketScout is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 05:10 PM   #10
MVP
 
kjcheezhead's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: May 2009
Blog Entries: 1
I am under the impressions that likenesses as well as names are protected right now. So just having a qb in a blue jersey who plays for an Indianapolis team, wears #18 and is 6' 5", 230 would be grounds for a lawsuit. If EA wins this case, 2k could use this likeness without paying a dime in license fees to anyone and no threat of a suit. That makes a big difference.
kjcheezhead is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 05:19 PM   #11
Recruiting App
 
PocketScout's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,392
Re: New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games"

Quote:
Originally Posted by kjcheezhead
I am under the impressions that likenesses as well as names are protected right now. So just having a qb in a blue jersey who plays for an Indianapolis team, wears #18 and is 6' 5", 230 would be grounds for a lawsuit. If EA wins this case, 2k could use this likeness without paying a dime in license fees to anyone and no threat of a suit. That makes a big difference.

With that you described as likeness, EA used Jim Browns "likeness" without paying him anything (though they said they did not use his likeness) and the courts ruled that it was legal to do so under the First Amendment. So with that there is nothing stopping 2k from doing the same thing, except the fact that without the NFL license the game will not move enough units (as 2k8 showed).

http://www.iptrademarkattorney.com/2...dismissed.html
__________________
NCAA 2014: Current Dynasty
PocketScout is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 11-19-2010, 05:26 PM   #12
MVP
 
kjcheezhead's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: May 2009
Blog Entries: 1
You may be right... although 2k8 didn't prove much of anything as far as what might sell. The game did not feature player likenesses like I described for Peyton Manning and a lot of money was spent securing rights to actual players.
kjcheezhead is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 05:33 PM   #13
Timbers - Jags - Hokies
 
The GIGGAS's Arena
 
OVR: 55
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rose City
Posts: 28,477
Blog Entries: 7
Re: New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games"

Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketScout
With that you described as likeness, EA used Jim Browns "likeness" without paying him anything (though they said they did not use his likeness) and the courts ruled that it was legal to do so under the First Amendment. So with that there is nothing stopping 2k from doing the same thing, except the fact that without the NFL license the game will not move enough units (as 2k8 showed).

http://www.iptrademarkattorney.com/2...dismissed.html
What about Madden Football 64? That game only had the NFLPA license (not the NFL), and according to vgchartz (which can be dubious at times), sold 0.85 million copies, compared to the next year's version of Madden ('99), which sold 0.89m. These numbers are for the N64 version:

http://gamrreview.vgchartz.com/game/...n-football-64/
http://gamrreview.vgchartz.com/game/1229/madden-nfl-99/
__________________
Rose City 'Til I Die
Duuuuuuuvvvvaaaaaaaal
Hokie Hokie Hokie Hy

Member: OS Uni Snob Assoc.
OS OT Post Champ '11

Twitter: @TheGIGGAS_OS
Xbox Live: TheGIGGAS
3DS: 1349-7755-3870
The GIGGAS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 06:00 PM   #14
Recruiting App
 
PocketScout's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,392
Re: New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games"

Quote:
Originally Posted by The GIGGAS
What about Madden Football 64? That game only had the NFLPA license (not the NFL), and according to vgchartz (which can be dubious at times), sold 0.85 million copies, compared to the next year's version of Madden ('99), which sold 0.89m. These numbers are for the N64 version:

http://gamrreview.vgchartz.com/game/...n-football-64/
http://gamrreview.vgchartz.com/game/1229/madden-nfl-99/
That is kinda hovering around the middle area, you dont have full nfl teams (logos) , but you have all the players, so people still see it as the nfl even when its not. I think the 2k8 game is a better example of not mimicking the nfl license and not having great sales. Also the Madden name doesnt hurt. If Madden 2012 did the same thing (NFLPA but no NFL) it would still move close to a 1m units because of the name alone.

I think a company could make a generic pro football (ala early FBPRO games) that did not have NFL or NFLPA and still be close enough that people would buy it, but not in mass. If there is an option that has the NFL or NFLPA it will sale a lot better than an unlicensed version. But this is just my worthless opinion on the matter
__________________
NCAA 2014: Current Dynasty
PocketScout is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 07:17 PM   #15
Pro
 
scottyo60's Arena
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Columbus
As a law student... what does this have to do with freedom of speech? as said in the article the first amendment right... this whole thing is stupid
scottyo60 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 11-19-2010, 08:19 PM   #16
Recruiting App
 
PocketScout's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,392
Re: New York Times on Sam Keller/EA Lawsuit: "It's about much more than video games"

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyo60
As a law student... what does this have to do with freedom of speech? as said in the article the first amendment right... this whole thing is stupid
The First Amendment is not just speech, it covers expression, art, words, ideas. Courts have ruled multiple times that video games fall under this same protection.
__________________
NCAA 2014: Current Dynasty
PocketScout is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 PM.
Top -