Old Madden Ratings Site Reborn Under New Management

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by GAM3R4LYF3

I thought that might have been why. So when he comes back he will increase again.

That is correct.

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by EmmittSmithx22x

wow. That sounds amazing!!!!!

What sounds amazing?

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Playmakers

I love this debate about Mikell.... I agree he's not a very atheletic guy and that does hurt his overall ratings. I looked at EA's rating and they gave him 85 speed and then I saw your rating and he has 80 speed.... I use a similiar speed chart to re-rate the players in NCAA Football and Mikell was closer to 78 speed for me but I gave him the additional boost up to make him 80 like you have him because it helped his overall on my roster file. Another guy that i had to kinda avoid his combine #'s was Desean Jackson.....now I don't agree with EA's ratings on him either but then when i looked at your ratings the one thing that jumped out at me was his agility being only 86 I had to actually give him a 94 in agility and 93 speed because the game has tendency ratings that label a player and Jackson was listed as a possession WR with the low physical attributes of 86 agility and I think you had him like 87 acceleration. So his speed I agree with we are only 1 point off but I just didn't like the fact that he was labled as a possession type WR do to his agility and acceleration being so low. The only other way around it would be to lower his catch ratings into the mid 70's then the game would consider him a speed guy again even with his agility and acceleration being in the high 80's So i guess my question is do you try to keep a guy labled with a certain tendency or do you ignore the tendencies all together? Like for example Carson Palmer I think he's more of pocket QB and that is how Madden assigns his tendency in the game but with 70+ speed, acceleration and agility Palmer would be borderline categorized as a scrambler type the only thing that pushes him back into the balanced QB tendency logic is his passing Ratings.....but if he had terrible accuarcy the game would list him as a scrambler instead of pocket QB or balanced QB Not sure if any of that stuff concerns you just wanted to know if you try to stay within a guys actual tendency category or not because sometimes the ratings trigger a guy to play different from his actual style depending on how you lable him by tendencies.

Yeah I completely disregard tendencies. Madden will always try to label a guy as this or that, but to me the accuracy is in their actual attributes. Remember, this is an entirely new system, which is what people wanted when I asked for votes in another thread; universal ratings. A FB with a 4.6 shouldn't be slower than a CB with a 4.6. This is the same for every other raw attribute. Now, if people would have preferred that I rate players by POSITION instead, then I would have done that. That would have gotten you better consistency with EA's ratings too. Here is the difference.

Desean Jackson:

FBG 2010 (current):
STR 51
AGI 86
SPD 92
ACC 87
JMP 77

FBG 2004-dependent on position (old):
STR 35
AGI 90
SPD 94
ACC 86
JMP 75

So you can see there is a difference. With the second method though, a CB with the same 40 time would have 95 SPD, a QB would have 88 SPD, a RB would have 94 SPD, and TE would have 86 SPD. So it would vary by position.

[Blazelore]

How's the progress so far? With all the raw attributes down did you start position specific ones yet?

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blazelore

How's the progress so far? With all the raw attributes down did you start position specific ones yet?

Yes I did start those up. QBs, RBs, and FBs are mostly done with some of the peripheral attributes. I still have to fill in the core attributes for RBs and FBs, but should get to those tonight.

[Blazelore]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

Yes I did start those up. QBs, RBs, and FBs are mostly done with some of the peripheral attributes. I still have to fill in the core attributes for RBs and FBs, but should get to those tonight.

Are you still aiming to have those set by October??? I'm hoping that is the case hopefully a roster file to download but if not at least I could just edit everyone myself based off your data.

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blazelore

Are you still aiming to have those set by October??? I'm hoping that is the case hopefully a roster file to download but if not at least I could just edit everyone myself based off your data.

Rosters will most likely be for next year...not this year. You will have to edit rosters on your own this year.

[Playmakers]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

Rosters will most likely be for next year...not this year. You will have to edit rosters on your own this year.

Just wanted to say thanks again for your efforts on the rosters....

I've made some changes to the speed burners on the field liek i mentioned before with Jackson. But most of the ratings are pretty spot on that you have done.

One thing I love about this formula is that in NCAA Football 11 the overall ratings drop quite a bit which is great. You can now really see the difference between speed guys at WR and RB. I've seen the best seperation in years in that area on the field during gameplay.

I've yet to see any of the created WR's on my file with 90+ speed get caught by a slow safety or LB from behind.