Madden NFL 11 Full Player Ratings: Miami Dolphins and New York Jets

[Ronnie brown23]

Quote: Originally Posted by DaCarver13

Lets not forget that Henne gets pulled out of plays so that the Phins can run the Wildcat. This can effect a QB's rhythm and flow in the game and also took away redzone attempts.

that has got to be the weakest, most irrelevant statement i have ever seen.

[warrior7807]

Quote: Originally Posted by DaCarver13

All I hear is a bunch of biased opinions. But I bet if you put a poll asking people that are neither a fan of the Phins or Jets, most would agree that Henne definitely deserves a higher rating than Sanchez. Even most experts agree as of right now that Henne is the guy you want over Sanchez. This mumbo jumbo talk that Sanchez was a rookie and Henne was on the bench the season before watching Penny talk is irrelevant. The fact of the matter is Henne did way more with way less! The numbers are also there. The only thing Sanchez did better was rush the ball and even there he lost 3 fumbles to Henne's 0. Guys love to bring up how Sanchez was in the conference finals, well number 1 if Nate Kaeding wouldn't have missed 3 FG's that wouldn't have been the case. The Chargers loss the game themselves. The most throws Sanchez had to throw in a game was 35. Henne threw 52 passes vs NE and another 55 vs HOU. Henne has shown that he can carry the team on his back when needed to. This is why I stated earlier that Henne in my mind is the real deal. When I see Sanchez do the same and win football games from behind and put the team on his shoulders then I'll be convinced. Its clear that EA needs help with ratings and it should be a team working on them because another example is Tyler Thigpen being rated lower than Pat White.

not to mention Cromartie decided not to play at all.

agree. this is everything ive said and some. The Jets were at their best when Sanchez threw the ball around 15 times a game. this is not a coincidence.

[iBlievN5]

I'm a fan of neither team, and I can see why Sanchez is rated higher. You refuse to. Fact: Jets were more successful than the Dolphins, they will probably be better again. Sanchez is expected to take a big leap forward from starting his whole rookie season. That's it. That's why he's 3 PTs, just 3 mind you, higher.

[warrior7807]

Quote: Originally Posted by iBlievN5

I'm a fan of neither team, and I can see why Sanchez is rated higher. You refuse to. Fact: Jets were more successful than the Dolphins, they will probably be better again. Sanchez is expected to take a big leap forward from starting his whole rookie season. That's it. That's why he's 3 PTs, just 3 mind you, higher.

didnt deny any of this. Sanchez needs to take a big leap, that way he may be an average NFL starter.
Thank you for so clearly stating why he is three points higher.. now i finally see previous season accomplishments mean nothing in ratings
You're willing to tell me Sanchez had more success than Henne last year? and note, QB success is different than Team success.

[Johnny "Too Tall"]

Quote: Originally Posted by iBlievN5

I'm a fan of neither team, and I can see why Sanchez is rated higher. You refuse to. Fact: Jets were more successful than the Dolphins, they will probably be better again. Sanchez is expected to take a big leap forward from starting his whole rookie season. That's it. That's why he's 3 PTs, just 3 mind you, higher.

What a weak argument. Apparently you refuse to face the facts.

1) Were talking about individual players here, not the teams. I think its been stated repeatedly why the Jets were successful last year ( if you don't know you really have no business commenting on this subject).
2) Sanchez is expected to take a big leap forward? So what. He hasn't. When he does, fine give him the 82 rating. Isn't that what potential is about anyways.

The fact is this guy has not performed well enough to merit that rating. Period.

[salbowski]

There is no argument to support Sanchez being rated higher than Henne.

The guy was plain and simply just awful last year.

Jets fans keeps saying, "the Jets were a good team so he was good", how does that make sense? I think you'll find the Jets were a good team and he stunk which makes his poor performance even worse.

Sanchez had one of the best Olines in football, the best running game and the best D but he had similar stats to Stafford who quite simply played for the Lions (enough said).

He's lucky to be rated above 75, infact I would have Tarvaris Jackson rated above him based on performances alone yet Jackson is rated 12 points lower.

[DaCarver13]

Quote: Originally Posted by iBlievN5

I'm a fan of neither team, and I can see why Sanchez is rated higher. You refuse to. Fact: Jets were more successful than the Dolphins, they will probably be better again. Sanchez is expected to take a big leap forward from starting his whole rookie season. That's it. That's why he's 3 PTs, just 3 mind you, higher.

Lol Yea cause Chad Henne is not expected to have a leap forward in production with Brandon Marshall in town.

[a4reak]

I think myself and several Jets fans have said Sanchez isn't worth an 82. However they gave him the rating bc he played well vs the Colts and Bengals in the PLAYOFFS!. That's why, stop acting clueless