NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[PeleDinho]

Quote: Originally Posted by Barkley7

I know that isn't McCoy's size. I think he's like 6'2" 215. I agree though. Bama tried to play milk the clock football all of the second half, which resuted in three and outs. Texas killed themselves with the shovel pass for TD, and plenty of dropped passes.

Okay your saying this but who was at QB, Colt or Gilbert? Exactly man. You honestly think Colt woulda' made the same mistakes that cost them going into half & the fumble late in the game on the drive that woulda tied it up? I'm not saying Texas was better than Bama' in any means, but what i'm saying is that Bama' fans are acting like they defeated the Texas team of 05' or the SC' team that same year. All im saying is i would give ya way more credit if ya defeated Texas WITH Colt because the game would've been worlds different.

[jmik58]

Here are some things that are 100% true no matter what..."I think"

Anyways, this conversation has been entertaining to follow and participate in because I don't have to protect "My team" but realistically some of you are blinded by fanboy syndrome.

Washington's offense will be very good this year. They have one of the best quarterbacks in the entire country and return nine starters on offense. All offensive skill players that started in '09 are back. Defensively they should improve slightly on their 9th best performance in the PAC-10 with six starters back.

Washington went 5-7 last year with the same players. Why wouldn't they win even more with those same exact players minus two linemen? As good as their offense is, their defense could easily hold them to a 6th or 7th place conference finish.

The middle of the PAC-10 is so wide open though, it's possibly the most competitive conference in the country.

[jmik58]

And McCoy had a completion percentage of 70% ! Seventy! I'm not a Texas fan, but I appreciate something like that. Obviously his size didn't hurt him, I feel half-special for even having to argue this.

There is no doubt that the outcome of the game could have drastically been different had he not become injured. I'm not going to say Alabama couldn't have won but it definitely mattered.

[jeremym480]

Quote: Originally Posted by PeleDinho

Yo stfu forreal man. Where did all of these Bama' fans come from to begin with? "now a new era" Ohh really now? You guys win a NC when arguably the best QB in the country last season gets hurt 1st quarter and still almost let a UT team with a TRUE Fr. pull of a comeback & now you guys run the College world? Come on man, your kid who switches teams every year...

Quote: Originally Posted by Barkley7

I know that isn't McCoy's size. I think he's like 6'2" 215. I agree though. Bama tried to play milk the clock football all of the second half, which resuted in three and outs. Texas killed themselves with the shovel pass for TD, and plenty of dropped passes.

QFT.

Bama did let off the gas quite a bit in the second half. The offense became very stagnant and predictable. Now would things have played out differently if Colt would have never gotten injured? None of us know for sure. And truthfully, it really doesn't matter.

[bamaCT12]

BAMA'S LOADED BABY!!!!
From T-Rich,
to Julio,
to G-Mac,
to Hightower,
to Barron,
to Dareus,
to Dre,
oh yea and that guy who won the Heisman

BTW: Why is LSU a 6 star school when Miami, Nebraska, and Tennessee are not?????

[Potatoes002]

Quote: Originally Posted by ufgators253

WSU getting a C+ and a B- offense is a bigger deal too me. No way they are a C+ caliber team.

Im shocked they even dropped WSU to a 2 star, since Washington didn't lose any prestige and they didn't touch their prestige after having like 5 straight losing seasons and going 0-12.

Wazzu is returning a lot of starters and have battled the last 2 years with injuries across the board (our PUNTER was our Quarterback for a series in the Apple Cup last year). C+ is fine with me as they still have a lot of Pac-10 talent on their team (but very young).

[thaima1shu]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmik58

Here are some things that are 100% true no matter what..."I think" Anyways, this conversation has been entertaining to follow and participate in because I don't have to protect "My team" but realistically some of you are blinded by fanboy syndrome. Washington's offense will be very good this year. They have one of the best quarterbacks in the entire country and return nine starters on offense. All offensive skill players that started in '09 are back. Defensively they should improve slightly on their 9th best performance in the PAC-10 with six starters back. Washington went 5-7 last year with the same players. Why wouldn't they win even more with those same exact players minus two linemen? As good as their offense is, their defense could easily hold them to a 6th or 7th place conference finish. The middle of the PAC-10 is so wide open though, it's possibly the most competitive conference in the country.

The one thing I am concerned about is the defense, though. We return some starters, but we lost easily our best two defensive players in Daniel Te'o-Nesheim and Donald Butler. Replacing them isn't going to be easy. Our depth at defensive end concerns me. We have two good linebackers in Mason Foster and Cort Dennison, but the third is kind of unknown.

I have no such concerns about the offense. It will improve. Locker should be a bit better, all our skill players should be better, and our o-line should improve solely through continuity. We have a very good looking freshman running back in Deontae Cooper who should help give Chris Polk some rest.

[Sublime12089]

LSU has been far more consistent the past few years, plus won a championship in the last 10.