Home

NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

This is a discussion on NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2010, 06:07 PM   #89
Rookie
 
Barkley7's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Nov 2009
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

LOL @ Alabama. Good luck stopping those beasts online. Boise and TCU seem overrated this year for pounding their conference's oversized highschool teams. What has Boise done the last couple years? Beat up WAC teams and go 3-1 vs Oregon and TCU. Big whoop weirdos.

On a side note, EA overrated Miami. What has Miami's offense done to deserve a 94? Oh, and Washington's offense (93) being higher than Florida's offense (92) is hilarious. I think one of the creators is probably an alum.

Last edited by Barkley7; 06-17-2010 at 06:15 PM.
Barkley7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 06:09 PM   #90
Robot
 
thaima1shu's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,602
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by osubeavs721
Um the overall and the offense are WAAAY to high for washington. In the last 3 years they have won 9 games and that includes an 0-12 season. Washington should be no higher than an 85. They wont finish in the top 5 in the pac 10 again this year.
And 5 of those 9 wins came last year, off of a winless year, with a new coach installing a brand new system. And regarding our offense, it was already pretty decent last year. And now we have 9 returning starters, losing our fullback and Ben Ossai on the o-line (who sucked anyways). A top 5 finish is also quite realistic, and expected, at least to me.
thaima1shu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 06:15 PM   #91
Banned
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Jun 2010
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Anybody know what Michigan ratings are?
PeleDinho is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 06-17-2010, 06:18 PM   #92
Rookie
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Aug 2009
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeleDinho
Yo stfu forreal man. Where did all of these Bama' fans come from to begin with?

"now a new era" Ohh really now? You guys win a NC when arguably the best QB in the country last season gets hurt 1st quarter and still almost let a UT team with a TRUE Fr. pull of a comeback & now you guys run the College world? Come on man, your kid who switches teams every year...
I am tired of this argument that Texas would have won had Colt McCoy not gotten hurt. One man cannot score 16 points by himself, and even if he could, it's a flaw in their scheme that their offensive production relies that heavily on ONE person. Colt McCoy was a shrimp (5'11", 185 lb) pitted up against monsters (the one that hit him was 6'3", 280), it was inevitable that he would get hurt eventually if he kept trying to run the ball. And we let off the gas a little bit after Colt got hurt too, I think. There was just an obvious change in tempo, I don't think either team knew how to react. The better TEAM won. Texas never really stood a chance, especially on Defense.
My .02
edscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 06:20 PM   #93
Rookie
 
Michgantown's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Jun 2010
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by edscott
I am tired of this argument that Texas would have won had Colt McCoy not gotten hurt. One man cannot score 16 points by himself, and even if he could, it's a flaw in their scheme that their offensive production relies that heavily on ONE person. Colt McCoy was a shrimp (5'11", 185 lb) pitted up against monsters (the one that hit him was 6'3", 280), it was inevitable that he would get hurt eventually if he kept trying to run the ball. And we let off the gas a little bit after Colt got hurt too, I think. There was just an obvious change in tempo, I don't think either team knew how to react. The better TEAM won. Texas never really stood a chance, especially on Defense.
My .02
Michgantown is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 06:21 PM   #94
Rookie
 
o 99 PROBL3MS o's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 271
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Bama fans should be wary of "reloading". USC recruits just as well as Bama and thought they would just reload after replaces 8 or so starters defensively. I don't expect the same thing from a Saban coached team but their will be some growing pains early on. It wouldn't suprise me at all if this year's Bama D is nearly as good as last year's by season end. You don't lose McClain, Cody, Anders, Jackson, Reamer, Deadrick, Fanney, Woodall, and MJ without feeling it. They will be nice by years end but 95-99 Nice? I think they should be in the 91-94 range defensively.
o 99 PROBL3MS o is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 06:21 PM   #95
Rookie
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Aug 2009
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michgantown
edscott is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 06-17-2010, 06:22 PM   #96
Banned
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: May 2010
Re: NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

Quote:
Originally Posted by edscott
I am tired of this argument that Texas would have won had Colt McCoy not gotten hurt. One man cannot score 16 points by himself, and even if he could, it's a flaw in their scheme that their offensive production relies that heavily on ONE person. Colt McCoy was a shrimp (5'11", 185 lb) pitted up against monsters (the one that hit him was 6'3", 280), it was inevitable that he would get hurt eventually if he kept trying to run the ball. And we let off the gas a little bit after Colt got hurt too, I think. There was just an obvious change in tempo, I don't think either team knew how to react. The better TEAM won. Texas never really stood a chance, especially on Defense.
My .02
This is one of the most ******** things I have ever heard in my life. Are you a Bammer.

Why the heck would Alabama slow down the Tempo they have been playing all year because a player gets hurt on the opposite team, and with a Freshman comes in. How would they not know how to react to a True Freshman coming in on the biggest stage in College Football for his first game.

You can also make a statement and then say I Think.
MWillard2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.
Top -